LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Where a firefighter filed a claim for benefits more than six years after his original work-related injury, but within two years of the employer’s last payment of medical charges related to the firefighter’s work-related back condition, the claim was timely filed in spite of the fact that the statute of limitations had already run on the claim at the time the medical services were provided [see Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-534(b)]. Maneuvering around what appeared to be clear precedent in the form of a 1936 Supreme Court of Kansas decision to the contrary, the court said the language of the statute was plain and unambiguous.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Schneider v. City of Lawrence, 2019 Kan. App. LEXIS 9 (Feb. 8, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 126.07.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see