Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Several months ago, an article in LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
By William Tappin, Esq., Law Offices of Tappin & Associates, Sierra Madre, CA There has been a lot of confusion with respect to whether ERISA preempts state laws regarding numerous programs, including...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
Stressing that under the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Act—except for scheduled-member cases—indemnity benefits are made for diminished wage-earning capacity and not medical impairment, as such, a state appellate court affirmed the Commission’s findings that an injured worker was not entitled to PPD benefits where he had returned to his same or similar employment and earns the same or higher wages [see Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-3(i) (2011)]. The court acknowledged that the worker could recover PPD benefits if he or she could show that the post-injury earnings were unreliable due to: (1) increase in general wage levels since the time of accident; (2) the claimant's own greater maturity and training; (3) longer hours worked by the claimant after the accident; (4) payment of wages disproportionate to capacity out of sympathy to the claimant; and (5) the temporary and unpredictable character of post-injury earnings. Here, however, the worker failed to overcome the rebuttable presumption that he had not suffered any disability.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Pruitt v. Howard Industries, 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 672 (Dec. 5, 2017)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 81.01.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law