Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
A federal district court recently held that plaintiff's execution of a Compromise and Release of his workers' compensation claim bars his right to raise claims under the ADA and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Accordingly, the federal court dismissed plaintiff’s case with prejudice. Prior to filing the federal action, the employee injured his right ankle and filed a workers’ compensation claim. The matter was resolved by the C&R while the plaintiff was represented by counsel. Among the provisions in the C&R was a general release that indicated that “all claims and issues arising out of Claimant's 05/11/2011 injury" were resolved. Noting that plaintiff received a lump sum of $50,000 at the time of the C&R, the federal district court indicated that the clarity and specificity of the C&R weighed strongly in favor of finding that plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to file suit on the claims he made in his complaint.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Hoggard v. Catch, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95181 (E.D. Pa. July 9, 2013) [2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95181 (E.D. Pa. July 9, 2013)].
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 102.03 [102.03].
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site