Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
CT Senate Passes Sweeping Consumer Protection Bill The Connecticut Senate passed an expansive consumer protection bill ( SB 5 ). Among other things, the measure would require service providers such as...
Social Media Warning Label Legislation Catching on in States Although Congress hasn’t responded to former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s call last June to take up legislation requiring...
OR Lawmakers Pass Age Discrimination Bill Oregon’s legislature passed a bill ( HB 3187 ) that would prohibit an employer from requesting an applicant’s age, date of birth or date of graduation...
WI Assembly Passes Multiple Healthcare Bills Wisconsin’s Assembly passed multiple healthcare-related bills with broad bipartisan support. One ( AB 43 ) would allow pharmacists to prescribe birth...
A nightmare may be coming to life for social media companies in Minnesota. There, Democrats in the state Legislature have embraced a pioneering bill, SB 3197 , which seeks to levy the nation’s...
Opponents of a first-of-its-kind bill (SB 1047) in California aimed at regulating major developers of artificial intelligence outnumbered supporters of the measure by 3 to 1, according to analysis by the state’s Senate. Although those 150 artificial intelligence companies, trade groups and other entities and individuals failed to kill the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, their opposition reflects AI’s emergence as the central front in the ongoing battle between states and the tech industry, after years of fighting over data privacy and other issues.
And it’s not too surprising that SB 1047 drew so much attention, given that California is a national leader in tech policy and home to 35 of the world’s top 50 AI companies.
“They need to get their positions heard in Sacramento, because what Sacramento does will shape so many other states,” said Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at the University of California San Diego. (PLURIBUS NEWS)
The Federal Trade Commission reported this month that fraud losses associated with bitcoin ATMs, or BTMs—similar to regular ATMs but allowing users to buy or send bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies instead of dollars—have risen 1,000% since 2020, exceeding $65 million in the first six months of this year. BTMs are vulnerable to malware attacks, allowing hackers to steal funds or manipulate transactions. (CNBC, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION)
Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta released new parental control features for Texas-based users to comply with HB 18, the Securing Children Online Through Parental Empowerment Act, which was enacted in 2023 and went into effect on Sept. 1. The law was intended to restrict kids’ access to harmful online content, including material promoting self-harm or substance abuse, as well as to give parents more control over their children’s online activity. (TEXAS TRIBUNE)
—By SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
As we’ve previously reported, most states have either introduced or enacted legislation related to AI in the past twelve months. AI continues to be a pressing issue for state lawmakers this year, potentially introducing a host of challenges for businesses. And we don’t foresee that changing any time soon. That is why LexisNexis® State Net® would like to offer you 30 days of AI legislative and regulatory alerts for free.*
Sign up here to Start Receiving Alerts
Disclaimer: LexisNexis® State Net® AI Alert Feed offer is limited to the individual addressee specifically selected for this promotion and is void where prohibited by law or by your employer’s policies. Individual must be a government affairs, legal or compliance professional. Offer expires December 31, 2024. Other restrictions may apply.
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.