Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
CA Bans Algorithmic Price Fixing California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed AB 325 , making it a violation of the state’s antitrust law, the Cartwright Act, “to use or distribute a common...
CO Becomes First State to Cap Prescription Drug Price On Oct. 3 Colorado’s Prescription Drug Affordability Review Board set an upper payment limit, or UPL, for Enbrel, a prescription drug used...
Move over, artificial intelligence. Quantum computing may be the next big thing in tech, and state legislators are beginning to take a look at it. For the uninitiated, quantum computing, like AI, is...
Glowing Progress Report on FL Insurance Market from Gallagher Re The insurance industry reforms enacted in Florida in 2022 and 2023 in response to soaring homeowners’ premiums and carrier insolvencies...
CA Enacts AI Safety Law California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed an artificial intelligence safety measure ( SB 53 ), exactly one year after vetoing a similar but broader bill (SB 1047 [2024]). The new...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Legislation has been introduced in Virginia (HB 747) and Vermont (HB 710) that would set standards for developers of “high risk”—meaning designed to make consequential decisions—or generative artificial intelligence systems. Among other things the bills would require developers to take steps to avoid “algorithmic discrimination” and complete impact assessments identifying potential risks posed by their systems.
“This is, so far, the first...comprehensive AI legislation [of 2024],” Tatiana Rice, senior counsel with the Future of Privacy Forum’s U.S. legislation team, said of the bills.
The bills are as significant as a measure introduced in California last year (AB 331) aimed at regulating automated decision-making tools, according to Rice. The California measure didn’t pass, but it’s author, Assembly member Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D) intends to reintroduce it this year. A similar bill (HB 1951) was introduced this month in Washington.
The author of Vermont AB 710, Rep. Monique Priestley (D), who has worked in the tech industry for twenty years, also introduced an AI consumer protection bill (AB 711). The bill would require developers “of any inherently dangerous artificial intelligence system that could be reasonably expected to impact consumers” to “exercise reasonable care to avoid any reasonably foreseeable risk arising out of the development, intentional and substantial modification, or deployment” of that system. (PLURIBUS NEWS, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
Florida’s House passed a bill (HB 1) that would prevent those under 16 from having a social media account and require social media platforms to confirm the age of new and existing users. The measure—a top priority for House Speaker Paul Renner (R)—goes significantly further than legislation passed last year in other states, including Arkansas (SB 396), Ohio (HB 33) and Utah (SB 152), which require minors to obtain parental consent to access social media platforms. One lawmaker said the bill was a “shot across the bow” of tech companies. (ORLANDO SENTINEL, PLURIBUS NEWS)
Maryland lawmakers introduced a pair of data privacy bills similar to laws passed in California, Connecticut and other states. The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (SB 541) would prohibit large companies from collecting consumer data for which there is no legitimate business need and require those companies to take steps to keep data they do collect secure from cyberattacks. The measure would also give consumers the right to view, correct, or delete their data or opt out of data collection altogether. The other bill (HB 603), dubbed the Maryland Kids Code, would provide new online protections for children. (WASHINGTON POST, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
A subcommittee of the Iowa House Judiciary Committee approved a bill (HF 2051) that would require entities that publish or distribute obscene content on the internet to verify the age of anyone seeking access to that content. House members also advanced a bill (HF 2049) that would specify that child pornography generated by artificial intelligence constitutes sexual exploitation. (GAZETTE [CEDAR RAPIDS], LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.