Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
ME Lawmakers Pass Data Center Ban The Maine Legislature passed a bill ( HB 207 ) that would make the state the first to temporarily ban the development of large data centers. The measure would impose...
State and Federal Funding Flowing for Ibogaine Research President Donald Trump signed an executive order providing up to $50 million in federal funding for states to conduct research on ibogaine, a psychedelic...
Smart glasses, like Ray-Ban Meta frames, allow wearers to take photos and videos, listen to music and make calls without ever picking up a phone. The technology, however, can also permit users to record...
IL House Passes ‘Junk Fee’ Bill The Illinois House passed a bill ( HB 228 ) that would amend the state’s Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act to prohibit businesses from...
Anthropic Not Releasing New AI Model to Public The artificial intelligence company Anthropic—recently in the headlines for demanding that the Pentagon agree to certain limitations on the use of...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Legislation has been introduced in Virginia (HB 747) and Vermont (HB 710) that would set standards for developers of “high risk”—meaning designed to make consequential decisions—or generative artificial intelligence systems. Among other things the bills would require developers to take steps to avoid “algorithmic discrimination” and complete impact assessments identifying potential risks posed by their systems.
“This is, so far, the first...comprehensive AI legislation [of 2024],” Tatiana Rice, senior counsel with the Future of Privacy Forum’s U.S. legislation team, said of the bills.
The bills are as significant as a measure introduced in California last year (AB 331) aimed at regulating automated decision-making tools, according to Rice. The California measure didn’t pass, but it’s author, Assembly member Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D) intends to reintroduce it this year. A similar bill (HB 1951) was introduced this month in Washington.
The author of Vermont AB 710, Rep. Monique Priestley (D), who has worked in the tech industry for twenty years, also introduced an AI consumer protection bill (AB 711). The bill would require developers “of any inherently dangerous artificial intelligence system that could be reasonably expected to impact consumers” to “exercise reasonable care to avoid any reasonably foreseeable risk arising out of the development, intentional and substantial modification, or deployment” of that system. (PLURIBUS NEWS, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
Florida’s House passed a bill (HB 1) that would prevent those under 16 from having a social media account and require social media platforms to confirm the age of new and existing users. The measure—a top priority for House Speaker Paul Renner (R)—goes significantly further than legislation passed last year in other states, including Arkansas (SB 396), Ohio (HB 33) and Utah (SB 152), which require minors to obtain parental consent to access social media platforms. One lawmaker said the bill was a “shot across the bow” of tech companies. (ORLANDO SENTINEL, PLURIBUS NEWS)
Maryland lawmakers introduced a pair of data privacy bills similar to laws passed in California, Connecticut and other states. The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (SB 541) would prohibit large companies from collecting consumer data for which there is no legitimate business need and require those companies to take steps to keep data they do collect secure from cyberattacks. The measure would also give consumers the right to view, correct, or delete their data or opt out of data collection altogether. The other bill (HB 603), dubbed the Maryland Kids Code, would provide new online protections for children. (WASHINGTON POST, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
A subcommittee of the Iowa House Judiciary Committee approved a bill (HF 2051) that would require entities that publish or distribute obscene content on the internet to verify the age of anyone seeking access to that content. House members also advanced a bill (HF 2049) that would specify that child pornography generated by artificial intelligence constitutes sexual exploitation. (GAZETTE [CEDAR RAPIDS], LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.