Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
CO Lawmakers Tweak Last Year’s First-In-Nation AI Law In a special session that began last week, Colorado Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez (D) introduced legislation ( SB 4 a ) that would...
States Seek Ways to Replace Expiring Federal Health Subsidies Policymakers in California, Colorado, Maryland and other states are considering ways to backfill pandemic-era federal health insurance subsidies...
The price of electricity has risen faster than inflation since 2022, and the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects that trend to continue through 2026 . In the past year, the cost of electricity...
Trump’s ‘Debanking’ Order Raises Questions for Lenders Days after accusing JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America of discriminating against him and other conservatives, President Donald...
Tech Groups Battling AI Regulation in CA Tech industry groups including the Business Software Alliance, the Consumer Technology Association and the Chamber of Progress are stepping up their lobbying...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Maine’s House narrowly approved a bill (LD 1977) that would impose restrictions on the digital information that companies can collect. Businesses would only be allowed to collect “personal data” that is “reasonably necessary and proportionate to provide or maintain a specific product or service requested by the consumer” and only be permitted to collect “sensitive data” that is “strictly necessary to provide or maintain a specific product or service requested by the consumer.” (PORTLAND PRESS HERALD)
The Arkansas Senate City, County and Local Affairs Committee approved two bills that would amend the Arkansas Data Centers Act (Act 851) passed last year, which restricted local governments’ ability to regulate “digital asset mining businesses.” SB 78 would impose noise limits on such businesses and prohibit foreign parties from owning them. SB 79 would require such businesses to be licensed by the state’s Department of Energy and Environment. (ARKANSAS ADVOCATE, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
Minnesota’s House passed a bill (HF 4077) that would institute consumer protections for users of social media. The bill would require social media platforms to allow users to determine what content they want to see. It would also require platforms to set strict default privacy settings and allow users to opt into “heightened” protections blocking features designed to keep them online, such as auto-play videos and infinite scroll, which platforms would have to automatically enable for minors. Platforms would also have to limit new account interactions to reduce so-called “burner” accounts, prevent user-generated content from being “scraped” for training artificial intelligence without user consent, and disclose information about how the platforms’ algorithms operate. (CENTER SQUARE)
The California Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee voted unanimously to advance AB 3080, which would require pornographic websites “to take reasonable steps to ensure” their content is only accessed by adults. Similar legislation has been passed by several red states, including Texas. (SACRAMENTO BEE)
The California News Publishers Association and the News/Media Alliance, two leading journalism trade groups, sent a letter last week urging California AG Rob Bonta (D) and the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Google for possible violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws with its decision to remove California news from some users’ search results. Google’s decision was prompted by legislation pending in California (AB 886), the California Journalism Preservation Act, which would require online companies like Google to pay usage fees for the news content they link to. The measure was passed by the state’s Assembly last year but has been held up in the Senate. (SACRAMENTO BEE, CNBC, LEXISNEXIS STATE NET)
—Compiled by SNCJ Managing Editor KOREY CLARK
Visit our webpage to connect with a LexisNexis® State Net® representative and learn how the State Net legislative and regulatory tracking service can help you identify, track, analyze and report on relevant legislative and regulatory developments.