Free subscription to the Capitol Journal keeps you current on legislative and regulatory news.
IL House Passes ‘Junk Fee’ Bill The Illinois House passed a bill ( HB 228 ) that would amend the state’s Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act to prohibit businesses from...
Anthropic Not Releasing New AI Model to Public The artificial intelligence company Anthropic—recently in the headlines for demanding that the Pentagon agree to certain limitations on the use of...
CT Lawmakers Target AI in Employment A bill (SB 435) before Connecticut’s legislature would require employers to disclose to job applicants when they are communicating with artificial intelligence...
On March 11, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) signed HB 2303 . The law, which takes effect June 11, bars employers from requesting, requiring or coercing workers or job applicants to accept a subcutaneous...
ND Regulators Approve Bank-to-Bank Stablecoin Use North Dakota’s Industrial Commission approved the use of the state bank’s planned stablecoin, the Roughrider Coin, for bank-to-bank transactions...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Let’s be real – nobody actually reads the terms and conditions they agree to when visiting a website. And for good reason. For all of us who are not corporate lawyers – and probably even for many who are – the jargon those terms are couched in is practically indecipherable.
Which is exactly how the tech companies like it. Because then consumers don’t think about how much of their personal information and data they are agreeing to let someone else buy and sell at will.
Queue a new bill in Congress that would require websites to lay out those terms and agreements in language the rest of us can understand. The legislation, dubbed the Terms-of-service Labeling, Design and Readability Act (TLDR) – a clever twist on the Internet slang for Too Long Didn’t Read – would also require websites to offer consumers a summary statement that would inform them of a number of things, including the kind of data the site collects on them, any recent data breaches that site has experienced and exactly how one goes about deleting their data if they so choose.
While the two major parties don’t agree on much these days, this is one area where bipartisanship is so far alive and well. In a joint statement, the bill’s three sponsors – two Democrats and one Republican – accused the companies of creating “unnecessarily long and complicated contracts, knowing that users don’t have the bandwidth to read lengthy legal documents when they’re simply trying to message a loved one or make a quick purchase.”
If the measure becomes law, enforcement would all on the Federal Trade Commission and the attorneys general in each state and the District of Columbia. It comes amidst increasing state efforts to give consumers more control over the use of their personal data and growing sentiment on Capitol Hill to force tech companies and social media outlets to be more transparent about their policies.
-- Rich Ehisen