Sept. 10, 2024 "Dear Secretary Mayorkas, Director Lechleitner, and Executive Associate Director Bible: We, the undersigned immigrant and civil rights organizations, legal services organizations...
State Department, Sept. 9, 2024 "The State Department, working in close collaboration with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, is pleased to announce the issuance of all available visas in...
David L. Cleveland and the Louise Trauma Center provide documentation to assist attorneys in preparing asylum cases for clients from Cameroon here and here .
Cyrus D. Mehta, Sept. 9, 2024 "At the naturalization interview the noncitizen applicant could face a rude shock if the examiner reveals that they made a misrepresentation in a long forgotten application...
USCIS, Aug. 29, 2024 "Effective Aug. 28, DHS is establishing a new C40 category on Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document (EAD). The C40 category is for individuals with a pending Form I...
Ud Din v. Garland
"[A] question arises as to how the Ud Dins’ removal will affect their future ability to apply for reentry to the United States. A permanent and unwaivable bar on reentry applies to any alien who filed a frivolous claim for asylum after receiving notice of that consequence. Otherwise, the alien may be subject to lesser, waivable bars on reentry. Because this court cannot determine on the present record whether the Ud Dins received the notice required to trigger a permanent, unwaivable bar, we grant review as to that single question and remand for the limited purpose of allowing the agency to make an express finding as to notice and, based on that finding, to specify the scope of the reentry bar that will attend the Ud Dins’ removal. ... (1) We DENY the Ud Dins’ petition for review of their removal orders insofar as they challenge the agency’s (a) discretionary decision to deny their applications for adjustment of status, and (b) frivolousness determination as to their untimely filed asylum applications. (2) We GRANT the Ud Dins’ petition for review of their removal orders insofar as they challenge the agency’s finding that they received the notice required to hold them ineligible for adjustment of status based on the filing of frivolous asylum applications. (3) We REMAND for the limited purpose of allowing the agency to make an express finding as to notice consistent with principles stated in this opinion and, based on that finding, to specify the scope of the reentry bar that will attend the Ud Dins’ removal."
[Hats off to Michael Z. Goldman!]