Visa Bulletin For January 2025
Platino-Bargas v. Garland (unpub.) "After reviewing the record, briefs of the parties, and previously filed joint motion of the Government and Petitioner to remand, we grant the motion to remand...
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas (9-0) "JUSTICE JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court. A common feature of our Nation’s complex system of lawful immigration is mandatory statutory rules paired with...
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 "This final rule makes updates to reflect a statutory change to the class of individuals who may qualify for Special Immigrant Visas...
USCIS, Dec. 10, 2024 "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a final rule that will support U.S. employers, foster economic growth, and improve access to employment authorization documents...
Aguirre Barbosa v. Barr
"Petitioner Pedro Aguirre Barbosa, a Mexican citizen, was convicted of robbery in the third degree in violation of Oregon Revised Statutes section 164.395. An immigration judge (“IJ”) denied relief from removal, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissed Petitioner’s appeal. As relevant here, the BIA held that section 164.395 categorically constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”) and that Petitioner had failed to prove membership in a “particular social group” for the purpose of establishing refugee status. We hold that section 164.395 is not categorically a CIMT, but we agree that Petitioner did not demonstrate membership in a “particular social group.” Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in part, deny it in part, and remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this decision."
[Hats way off to appointed pro bono counsel Nadia Dahab of Portland's Stoll Berne! "Nadia’s practice focuses on both trial and appellate advocacy. She has experience in matters relating to complex business disputes, securities fraud, employment, property law, and the environment. Owing to her extensive clerkship experience, Nadia has a passion for appeals. She has authored briefs on a number of appellate issues and has argued cases in the Oregon Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Nadia frequently appears in the state appellate courts on behalf of organizations, including the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae. Nadia is also committed to pro bono work. She is active in the Oregon appellate courts pro bono program and has appeared more recently in several pro bono immigration cases. Before practicing law, Nadia earned her civil engineering degree and practiced civil and water resources engineering—specializing in hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality systems design—in Dallas, Texas. She is a licensed Professional Engineer (currently on inactive status) by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers."]