EOIR, Dec. 1, 2023
"Application Deadline: Friday, December 15, 2023"
American Immigration Council and the Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic of the James H. Binger Center for New Americans, University of Minnesota Law School, Nov. 28, 2023
"This practice advisory...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/30/2023
"On October 30, 2023, the U.S. Department of State (Department of State) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking...
On Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2023 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Wilkinson v. Garland. Issue: Whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the...
On Nov. 17, 2023 the AAO reversed an EB-2 National Interest Waiver denial by the Texas Service Center, saying: "The Petitioner has met the requisite three prongs set forth in the Dhanasar analytical...
NWIRP, July 22, 2019
"Today, a federal appeals court ruled that asylum-seekers must continue to receive bond hearings while the court considers the Trump administration’s appeal to deny bond hearings with procedural protections to asylum seekers.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration’s bid to arbitrarily jail asylum-seekers without a bond hearing while it considers whether to keep in place a court decision by a federal district judge in Seattle. The decision held that the policy of denying bond hearings violated due process. The district judge also previously held that the government is required to provide basic procedural protections during the hearings, but the appeals court declined to require the government to put those protections in place while the appeal is pending.
The Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, American Immigration Council, and the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the policy, announced April 16th by Attorney General William Barr in Matter of M-S-. The lawsuit, Padilla v ICE, cites violations of due process, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
The following reaction is from:
Matt Adams, legal director, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project: “This order restores a fundamental protection that has existed for decades—the right to seek a bond hearing—to protect against people being unnecessarily locked up while they wait for their asylum claims to be processed,” said Matt Adams, legal director for NWIRP. “Our class members are locked up for 6-12 months waiting for their case to be decided, even though every single one of them was interviewed by DHS officers and found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture.”
Trina Realmuto, directing attorney, American Immigration Council: “Today’s decision restores bond hearings for many individuals seeking protection in the United States. We will continue to challenge the government’s unlawful attempt to eliminate these hearings and to fight for basic procedural protections so that asylum seekers may have a fair opportunity at winning release.”
Michael Tan, senior staff attorney, American Civil Liberties Union: “No matter what the Trump administration says, the Constitution forbids the government from locking people up without basic due process. This ruling will help make sure that asylum seekers remain free from arbitrary detention.”
Read the ruling here.
Leila Kang, Staff Attorney
(206) 957-8608; email@example.com
Maria Frausto, American Immigration Council
(202) 507-7526; firstname.lastname@example.org
Inga Sarda-Sorensen, ACLU National
(347) 514-3984; email@example.com