TRAC, Apr. 2024 "At the end of March 2024, 3,524,051 active cases were pending before the Immigration Court."
Sanchez-Perez v. Garland "One day after he pleaded guilty to violating a Tennessee domestic-violence law, the federal government initiated removal proceedings against Jose Yanel Sanchez-Perez. Ultimately...
In a letter dated April 12, 2024 the State Department and USCIS discuss "concerns about biometrics collection for applicants for T nonimmigrant status and petitioners for U nonimmigrant status abroad...
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 84 / Tuesday, April 30, 2024 "This final rule adopts and replaces regulations relating to key aspects of the placement, care, and services provided to unaccompanied...
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas Issue: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. Case below: 75 F.4th 1157 (11th Cir....
Chamber of Commerce v. DHS
"The Court once again confronts a challenge to the Administration’s assertion that the H-1Bvisa program adversely affects American workers to such a degree that it must take immediateaction. See Nat’l Ass’n of Manufacturers v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. 20-cv-4887-JSW, -- F.Supp. 3d --, 2020 WL 5847503 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2020) (“NAM”). Here, Plaintiffs bring claimsunder the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and ask the Court to set aside two interim finalrules promulgated by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) and by the Department of HomelandSecurity (“DHS”): Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and PermanentEmployment of Certain Aliens in the United States, 85 Fed. Reg. 63,872 (Oct. 8, 2020) (“DOLRule”); Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program, 85 Fed. Reg. 63,918(Oct. 8, 2020) (“DHS Rule”) (collectively, the “Rules”). ... Plaintiffs are entitled to judgmentin their favor on their first two claims for relief, and the Court sets aside the Rules on the basis thatthey were promulgated in violation of 5 U.S.C. section 553(b)."