DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
Texas v. Biden, Dec. 15, 2022
"This case began as a challenge to the termination of the Migrant Protection Protocols("MPP") program in January 2021. Although the legal instruments governing the terminationevolved over time by issuance of new memoranda, this case continued. Most recently, theSupreme Court remanded the case for this Court to consider Plaintiff States of Texas andMissouri's ("Plaintiffs") claims against the most recent memoranda. The Court now considersPlaintiffs' Motion to Postpone the Effective Date of Agency Action ("Motion") (ECF No. 149),filed on August 8, 2022. Plaintiffs carry their burden to show - among other things - they willlikely prevail on the merits. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion and STAYS the mostrecent memoranda, issued on October 29, 2021, and corresponding decision to terminate MPPuntil the Court can resolve the merits of Plaintiffs' claims."