DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
In an unpublished, three-member panel (GREER, Wendtland; O'Connor dissenting) decision dated April 24, 2019, the BIA stated:
"[B]ased on a straightforward application of the categorical approach outlined in Taylor and its progeny, we must conclude that the DHS has not met its burden of establishing by 'clear and convincing evidence' that the respondent's conviction for grand larceny in the second degree under New York law renders her removable as charged under section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act."
[Hats off to Michael Z. Goldman!]