Sareen Habeshian, Axios, Dec. 1, 2023
"Texas lawmakers' effort to block the Biden administration from removing razor wire fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border was blocked by a federal judge...
Jordan Vonderhaar, Texas Observer, Nov. 21, 2023
"Forty miles south of Ciudad Juárez, protected from the glaring desert sun by a blanket tied to a ladder, a mother nurses her nine-month-old...
Miriam Jordan, New York Times, Nov. 28, 2023
"The story of the Miskito who have left their ancestral home to come 2,500 miles to the U.S.-Mexico border is in many ways familiar. Like others coming...
"Four national immigration experts will discuss the changing landscape of border law and policies at a free Dec. 6 webinar sponsored by the American Bar Association Commission on Immigration...
Theresa Vargas, Washington Post, Nov. 25, 2023
"The Northern Virginia doctor was born in D.C. and given a U.S. birth certificate. At 61, he learned his citizenship was granted by mistake."
TRAC, July 29, 2019
"Since this administration announced the Migration Protection Protocols (MPP) on January 24, 2019, more commonly referred to as "Remain in Mexico," the number of individuals and families diverted to this program has been expanding rapidly. This report takes an early look at one key challenge these individuals face: finding an attorney to help them successfully argue their asylum claims in Immigration Court. Without representation, the odds of securing asylum are dismal. Few asylum seekers over the years have been successful in obtaining asylum without an experienced attorney to help them prepare and present their cases.
According to the latest court records available, as of the end of June 2019, a total of 1,155 MPP cases had already been decided. Yet only 14 of these—just 1.2 percent—were represented.
Because of the recency of the MPP program, cases decided this quickly may be far from typical. A better indicator may be representation rates on the much larger number of pending cases. As of the end of June 2019, there were 12,997 pending MPP cases on the Immigration Court rolls. Of these, only 163 individuals had found representation—just 1.3 percent.
Clearly, the record thus far is that very few asylum seekers forced to remain in Mexico have been able to secure representation for their upcoming Immigration Court proceedings.
It seems likely that representation rates will increase as individuals have more time to look for an attorney. This is certainly true for individuals in regular court cases. In cases that have been waiting up to a month since their notice to appear was issued, court records show that relatively few (6.9%) have an attorney who has registered their appearance in the case. By three months, however, about a quarter (23.6%) have secured representation, and this has grown to over a third (35.4%) within six months for pending cases.
While MPP cases that have been waiting longer do have somewhat higher representation rates, they remain far below regular cases pending for the same period. See Figure 1. At as much as three months, while 23.6 percent of regular cases that are pending have found representation, only 4.1 percent of MPP cases had. See Table 1.
Using the Freedom of Information Act, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University has been able to obtain case-by-case MPP records on individuals assigned to the program. The latest available data tracks 14,152 individuals through the end of June 2019.
Accompanying this report, a new public MPP web query tool allows the public for the first time to drill into these data and follow the growing numbers of individuals required to remain in Mexico. The new tool will be updated as new data arrive to allow the public to examine how these cases are resolved, and to contrast outcomes depending upon representation, nationality, hearing location and hearing attendance.
 See, for example, "Odds of Gaining Asylum Five Times Higher When Represented," and "Representation Makes Fourteen-Fold Difference in Outcome: Immigration Court 'Women with Children' Cases,".