Muzaffar Chishti, Kathleen Bush-Joseph, Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, and Madeleine Greene, MPI, Dec. 10, 2024 "... This article reviews the Biden administration’s track record on immigration...
Brendan Rascius, Miami Herald, Dec. 9, 2024 "President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to end birthright citizenship during his second term. Could he actually do it? ... [A]ccording to legal experts...
Cornell Law writes: "On behalf of Steve Yale-Loehr , we want to extend our gratitude for your participation in The (Im)possibility of Immigration Reform symposium. We had an awe-inspiring amount of...
Zachary Schermerle, USA Today, Dec. 8, 2024 "Trump’s immigration rhetoric is already impacting college students; Yale and Cornell are among the universities cautioning foreign students against...
The Beinart Notebook, Dec. 8, 2024 "Our guest is Muzaffar Chishti , Senior Fellow at the Migration Policy Institute, and one of America’s foremost experts on immigration policy. We’ll...
"The American Civil Liberties Union obtained a judgment Wednesday against Pinal County, Sheriff Paul Babeu and two Pinal County sheriff’s deputies on behalf of an Arizona woman who spent five days in the custody of immigration authorities after a Pinal County sheriff’s deputy “cited and released” her following a traffic stop, then instructed another sheriff’s deputy to transport her to a nearby Border Patrol station. The $25,001 judgment resolves a lawsuit filed by the ACLU in federal district court in September.
“It was a nightmare to spend those five days in detention not knowing what was going to happen to me or my children,” said Maria Cortes, who at the time of her detention had a pending U-Visa application stemming from her status as a victim of domestic violence. “I offered to show the officer who stopped me a copy of my pending U-Visa, but he said he wasn’t interested. I hope something good comes of my terrible experience and that what happened to me never happens again in Pinal County.”
Ms. Cortes claimed that her detention was prolonged solely based on a suspicion that she was an undocumented immigrant, violating her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The incident occurred on Sept. 29, 2012; Ms. Cortes was granted a U-Visa less than a year later.
Since the “show me your papers” provision of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law SB 1070 went into effect two years ago, the ACLU has documented numerous cases of racial profiling and illegal detention by law enforcement officials throughout the state. In Tucson alone, the ACLU has filed several “Notices of Claim” alleging that law enforcement officers have engaged in racial profiling and illegal detention as a result of the law.
Ms. Cortes’ case was the first federal lawsuit to challenge the application of the “show me your papers” law in Arizona.
“SB 1070 encourages officers to presume people are undocumented simply because of the color of their skin or the way they speak,” said Araceli Martinez-Olguin, an attorney with the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. “We filed suit on behalf of Ms. Cortes to highlight the harm that stems from having a ‘show me your papers’ law on the books. We’re pleased to announce a resolution that provides Ms. Cortes a measure of justice and we hope that individuals who experience racial profiling will continue to report that abuse.”
Last year, the ACLU took action against the South Tucson Police Department (STPD) on behalf of an individual who was detained by officers without any legal basis and turned over to the Border Patrol. The claim charged false arrest and imprisonment, unreasonable search and seizure and violation of his equal protection under the law. A lawsuit was averted in May of this year after STPD agreed to overhaul the department’s policies with respect to immigration enforcement.
In addition to Ms. Martinez-Olguin, attorneys for Ms. Cortes include Victoria Lopez, Dan Pochoda and Joel Edman of the ACLU of Arizona, and Donald W. Brown, Alexa Hansen and Aseem Padukone of Covington & Burling LLP.
Click here for a copy of the amended complaint and here for a copy of the judgment in Cortes v. Lakosky." - ACLU, Dec. 18, 2014.