Raga Justin, Times Union, June 5, 2023 " Stephen Yale-Loehr , an immigration attorney who teaches immigration law at Cornell University, pointed to climate change as one of the major forces displacing...
Narintohn Luangrath, Julia Englebert, and Carson Turner, The Regulatory Review, June 10, 2023 "In this week’s Saturday Seminar, scholars assess the impacts of Title 42 on vulnerable migrants...
AIC, June 7, 2023 "The American Immigration Council appeared before the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Sub-committee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement to address the...
JACOB HAMBURGER AND STEPHEN YALE-LOEHR, June 3, 2023 "With the end of the COVID-19 emergency on May 11, the Title 42 border restrictions have been officially lifted. Although the situation at the...
Jorge Cancino, Univision, June 2, 2023 "The positions taken by lawyers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) show that, contrary to the campaign discourse and the one defended during the first months...
"We examine the budgetary and economic implications of alternative strategies to addressing undocumented immigrants. In particular, we focus on the implications of immediately and fully enforcing current law, and find that it would be fiscally and economically costly. The federal government would have to spend roughly $400 billion to $600 billion to address the 11.2 million undocumented immigrants and prevent future unlawful entry into the United States. In order to remove all undocumented immigrants, each immigrant would have to be apprehended, detained, legally processed, and transported to his or her home country. In turn, this would shrink the labor force by 11 million workers and reduce real GDP by $1.6 trillion." - Ben Gitis, Laura Collins, March 6, 2015.