Cornell Law writes: "On behalf of Steve Yale-Loehr , we want to extend our gratitude for your participation in The (Im)possibility of Immigration Reform symposium. We had an awe-inspiring amount of...
Zachary Schermerle, USA Today, Dec. 8, 2024 "Trump’s immigration rhetoric is already impacting college students; Yale and Cornell are among the universities cautioning foreign students against...
The Beinart Notebook, Dec. 8, 2024 "Our guest is Muzaffar Chishti , Senior Fellow at the Migration Policy Institute, and one of America’s foremost experts on immigration policy. We’ll...
Human Rights Watch, Dec. 5, 2024 "United States Border Patrol agents are denying asylum access to families fleeing violence in Mexico, treating them abusively and dismissively, and returning them...
Anjum Gupta, David Noll, Slate, Dec. 3, 2024 "... Although groups like the ACLU will challenge the expanded use of expedited removal , don’t look to the courts for a quick remedy. IIRIRA strips...
USA v. Iowa
"Dissatisfied with how the United States Government is handling immigration, the Iowa Legislature decided to take matters into its own hands by enacting new legislation (known as Senate File 2340) that, among other things: (i) imposes criminal penalties under state law for certain immigration-related offenses; and (ii) requires state court judges to order noncitizens to return to the foreign countries from which they came. As a matter of politics, the new legislation might be defensible. As a matter of constitutional law, it is not. Under binding Supreme Court precedent, Senate File 2340 is preempted in its entirety by federal law and thus is invalid under the Supremacy Clause. The Court therefore GRANTS the motions for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiffs in these related cases and ENJOINS the enforcement of Senate File 2340 pending further proceedings."