The lawsuit is here . The statement by California Attorney General Rob Bonta is here . The statement by Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings is here .
Robert Brodsky, Bart Jones, Newsday, Jan. 20, 2025 "Arguably the most controversial order he signed Monday, with potentially the largest impact, would seek to end "birthright citizenship"...
The New York Times is reporting that four top EOIR officials have been fired: "The four officials included Mary Cheng, the acting director of the Executive Office of Immigration Review. The three...
Cassandra Burke Robertson, Irina D. Manta, The Conversation, Jan. 20, 2025 "...We are law professors who’ve studied the complex intersection of executive power and immigration enforcement...
Jose Antonio Vargas, Jan. 19, 2025 - How I Got “Legal” After 31 Years as an Undocumented American [Spoiler Alert: He got an O-1 visa and a (d)(3) waiver!] "On Christmas night, for...
Coalition email, Sept. 22, 2021: "A federal court ruled that key sections of Florida’s anti-sanctuary law violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, delivering a decision that strikes a major blow to the state’s anti-immigrant policy makers and a decisive victory for communities who fought to defeat the law beginning in 2019. In response to the Judge’s 110-page decision, the coalition released the following joint statement:
“This ruling is a victory for immigrants across the state of Florida. This law was clearly developed to encourage racial profiling, civil rights violations, isolation of immigrant communities, and unjust deportations. It did more harm for the causes of public safety than good. This should send a clear message to Gov. DeSantis and all those proponents of this racist law that they will not go unchallenged.” Advocates proved that the law, known as S.B. 168, undermines public safety and increases racial profiling, and that it was designed with the consultation of anti-immigrant hate groups. In today’s ruling, Judge Beth Bloom wrote, “[T]he Sanctuary Prohibition was enacted based on biased and unreliable data generated by anti-immigrant hate groups FAIR and CIS, despite the chilling effect and disparate impact that this provision would have on immigrant communities. Moreover, the Best Efforts Provision anticipated and intended to grant law enforcement officers expansive discretion on when and how to use their ‘best efforts,’ despite the knowledge that such proactive policing measures were likely to increase the amount of racial profiling that occurs during law enforcement interactions.” The lawsuit was filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Community Justice Project, and University of Miami School of Law’s Immigration Clinic on behalf of nine organizations, including Florida Immigrant Coalition, Farmworker Association of Florida, WeCount!, Americans for Immigrant Justice, Hope Community Center, QLatinx, Westminster Presbyterian United Church, The Guatemalan-Maya Center, Inc., Family Action Network Movement and the City of South Miami. In 2019, the Florida Legislature passed SB 168, a law requiring local law enforcement agencies to use their “best efforts” to comply with the enforcement of federal immigration law. SB 168 also prohibited localities from adopting sanctuary policies. The Plaintiffs challenged SB 168, asserting the law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Both the “best efforts” provision and the prohibition against sanctuary cities were struck down with today’s ruling. The case, City of South Miami, et al. v. DeSantis, et al., was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. Today’s order can be found here: https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/de_201-_order_sb_168_trial.pdf CONTACT: Melissa Taveras, FLIC, melissa@floridaimmigrant.org, 786-663-6690 Marion Steinfels, SPLC, marion.steinfels@splcenter.org, 202-557-0430 Rebecca Sharpless, UM Immigration Clinic, rsharpless@law.miami.edu, 305-284-3576 Nadege Green, Community Justice Project, nadege@communityjusticeproject.com "
“This ruling is a victory for immigrants across the state of Florida. This law was clearly developed to encourage racial profiling, civil rights violations, isolation of immigrant communities, and unjust deportations. It did more harm for the causes of public safety than good.
This should send a clear message to Gov. DeSantis and all those proponents of this racist law that they will not go unchallenged.”
Advocates proved that the law, known as S.B. 168, undermines public safety and increases racial profiling, and that it was designed with the consultation of anti-immigrant hate groups.
In today’s ruling, Judge Beth Bloom wrote, “[T]he Sanctuary Prohibition was enacted based on biased and unreliable data generated by anti-immigrant hate groups FAIR and CIS, despite the chilling effect and disparate impact that this provision would have on immigrant communities. Moreover, the Best Efforts Provision anticipated and intended to grant law enforcement officers expansive discretion on when and how to use their ‘best efforts,’ despite the knowledge that such proactive policing measures were likely to increase the amount of racial profiling that occurs during law enforcement interactions.”
The lawsuit was filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Community Justice Project, and University of Miami School of Law’s Immigration Clinic on behalf of nine organizations, including Florida Immigrant Coalition, Farmworker Association of Florida, WeCount!, Americans for Immigrant Justice, Hope Community Center, QLatinx, Westminster Presbyterian United Church, The Guatemalan-Maya Center, Inc., Family Action Network Movement and the City of South Miami.
In 2019, the Florida Legislature passed SB 168, a law requiring local law enforcement agencies to use their “best efforts” to comply with the enforcement of federal immigration law. SB 168 also prohibited localities from adopting sanctuary policies. The Plaintiffs challenged SB 168, asserting the law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Both the “best efforts” provision and the prohibition against sanctuary cities were struck down with today’s ruling.
The case, City of South Miami, et al. v. DeSantis, et al., was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.
Today’s order can be found here: https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/de_201-_order_sb_168_trial.pdf
CONTACT: Melissa Taveras, FLIC, melissa@floridaimmigrant.org, 786-663-6690 Marion Steinfels, SPLC, marion.steinfels@splcenter.org, 202-557-0430 Rebecca Sharpless, UM Immigration Clinic, rsharpless@law.miami.edu, 305-284-3576 Nadege Green, Community Justice Project, nadege@communityjusticeproject.com "
CONTACT:
Melissa Taveras, FLIC, melissa@floridaimmigrant.org, 786-663-6690
Marion Steinfels, SPLC, marion.steinfels@splcenter.org, 202-557-0430
Rebecca Sharpless, UM Immigration Clinic, rsharpless@law.miami.edu, 305-284-3576
Nadege Green, Community Justice Project, nadege@communityjusticeproject.com "