My friend Morgan Smith wrote this note about the Rio Grande in July 2024. Learn more about Morgan here , here and here .
J.A.M. v. USA "The Court holds that Oscar is entitled to a much lower, but still notable award of $175,000 because he was somewhat older at the time of the incident, was detained for about half...
Path2Papers, July 17, 2024 " What are the policy changes the Biden administration is implementing regarding temporary work visas? On June 18, 2024, the Biden administration announced a policy...
DOJ, July 18, 2024 "The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against Southwest Key Programs Inc. (Southwest Key), a Texas-based nonprofit that provides housing to unaccompanied children who are...
Jeanne Kuang, CalMatters, July 18, 2024 "Even with all the industries where Californians went on strike during last year’s “hot labor summer,” some of the most active sites of...
Liu v. Mayorkas, Amended Complaint, June 29, 2021
"The cap registration rules and regulations codified at 8 C.F.R, § 214.2(h)(8)(iii) (“cap registration rules”) are unlawful. First, DHS was rulemaking outside of its authority when it promulgated the cap registration rules because the rules prioritize H-1B lottery registrations and ignore the INA’s mandate to allocate H-1B visas by “alien.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(1), (3), (7). Second, even assuming that the creation of the cap registration rules was a lawful exercise of DHS’s rule-making authority, USCIS has implemented the cap registration rules in a manner that is arbitrary and capricious because the registration process does not provide a method for “aliens who are subject to the numerical limitations” to have future petitions adjudicated in the “order in which petitions are filed.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(3). The cap registration rules promulgated by DHS and implemented by USCIS have led to H-1B applicants being selected in a manner not contemplated by the INA. Therefore, because the cap registration rules violate the INA, they must be set aside."