White House, Feb. 7, 2025 - Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa Austin Kocher, Ph.D., has an explainer here . Afrikaners say, "Thanks, but no thanks."
LexisNexis, Feb. 6, 2025 - "LexisNexis® Legal & Professional, a leading global provider of AI-powered analytics and decision tools, is pleased to announce that Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia has...
ACLU, Feb. 7, 2025 "Immigrants’ rights advocates signed a letter today urging the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Defense (DOD), and State Department to provide immediate...
Links will be posted when available.
Dara Kerr, The Guardian, Feb. 6, 2025 "US immigration is gaming Google to create a mirage of mass deportations ... Thousands of press releases about decade-old enforcement actions topped search...
Liu v. Mayorkas, Amended Complaint, June 29, 2021
"The cap registration rules and regulations codified at 8 C.F.R, § 214.2(h)(8)(iii) (“cap registration rules”) are unlawful. First, DHS was rulemaking outside of its authority when it promulgated the cap registration rules because the rules prioritize H-1B lottery registrations and ignore the INA’s mandate to allocate H-1B visas by “alien.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(1), (3), (7). Second, even assuming that the creation of the cap registration rules was a lawful exercise of DHS’s rule-making authority, USCIS has implemented the cap registration rules in a manner that is arbitrary and capricious because the registration process does not provide a method for “aliens who are subject to the numerical limitations” to have future petitions adjudicated in the “order in which petitions are filed.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(3). The cap registration rules promulgated by DHS and implemented by USCIS have led to H-1B applicants being selected in a manner not contemplated by the INA. Therefore, because the cap registration rules violate the INA, they must be set aside."