JACOB HAMBURGER AND STEPHEN YALE-LOEHR, June 3, 2023 "With the end of the COVID-19 emergency on May 11, the Title 42 border restrictions have been officially lifted. Although the situation at the...
Jorge Cancino, Univision, June 2, 2023 "The positions taken by lawyers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) show that, contrary to the campaign discourse and the one defended during the first months...
Weill Cornell Medicine, June 2, 2023 "Recent uncertainties regarding the legal status of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program underscore the urgency for policymakers to reassess...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/05/2023 "BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION America is more than a place; it is an idea...
Tim Balk, NY Daily News, June 2, 2023 "A Texas judge who ruled two years ago against the legality of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program heard oral arguments on Thursday in a high...
"A Washington federal judge on Monday kept alive a class action seeking lawyers for immigrant children facing removal proceedings, but trimmed the suit of three of nine named plaintiffs and a count of violating the Immigration and Nationality Act. In his decision, U.S. District Judge Thomas S. Zilly dismissed two of the children because they might never undergo removal proceedings while another he dismissed because she received an order of removal in absentia, which can only be rescinded upon an immigration judge’s grant of a motion, according to the order. The judge also struck classwide injunctive relief in the form of delayed continuances of deportation proceedings, but allowed the individual children involved to seek an injunction. “The INA makes clear that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief,” he said. And although he tossed the plaintiffs’ claim that the government violates the INA by not allowing children to be represented by attorneys during removal proceedings, he found that their related due-process claims under the Constitution survive. Ahilan Arulanantham, an ACLU attorney representing the plaintiffs, told Law360 in a Monday statement that the plaintiffs are pleased the judge allowed the case to continue and put an end to the government’s attempts to further delay resolution." - Law360, Apr. 13, 2015.