Perez Parra et al. v. Dora Castro "It is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation...
Intersections with Dr. Russell " Intersections with Dr. Russell , is a bi-weekly podcast tackling immigration through storytelling, data, and myth-busting—all through the lens of a Black immigrant...
New Hampshire ACLU, Feb. 10, 2025 "A federal court in New Hampshire today blocked President Trump’s executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U...
White House, Feb. 7, 2025 - Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa Austin Kocher, Ph.D., has an explainer here . Afrikaners say, "Thanks, but no thanks."
LexisNexis, Feb. 6, 2025 - "LexisNexis® Legal & Professional, a leading global provider of AI-powered analytics and decision tools, is pleased to announce that Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia has...
Travis Bubenik, CNS, Dec. 10, 2019
"A federal judge on Tuesday issued a nationwide injunction blocking the Trump administration’s plan to use $3.6 billion in military construction money to build the president’s long-promised border wall.
The decision followed a previous ruling in a lawsuit brought by a West Texas county and an advocacy group, which determined that the president’s national emergency declaration at the southern border in February was “unlawful.”
U.S. District Judge David Briones ruled in October that the administration’s attempt to spend more than $6 billion in Department of Defense funds for the wall project violated the will of Congress, which only approved $1.375 billion for limited border barrier construction in South Texas.
“Because Defendant’s actions are unlawful and the people’s representatives – Congress – declined to augment the border wall budget as Defendants attempt, the public interest would be served by halting them,” Briones wrote in Tuesday’s order."