LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
Where a worker sustained fatal injuries in a ditch cave-in and the worker’s widow filed a tort action against the owner of a masonry business alleging negligence, it was appropriate for the insurer under the business’ commercial general liability policy to investigate whether the deceased worker was an employee under Pennsylvania law—which would have meant it owed no duty to defend. There was conflicting evidence as to such employment status, and the commercial insurer’s decision to seek a declaratory judgment action was not the sort of “bad faith” or “frivolous” refusal to pay contemplated by the statute. The widow’s separate civil action for the insurer’s alleged bad faith could not withstand a summary judgment motion and it was, therefore, appropriate for the federal district court to grant the insurer relief from the suit.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Bodnar v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17903 (3rd Cir., Oct. 4, 2016)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 152.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law