CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the most common reasons evaluating physicians flunk the apportionment validity test is due to their...
Position paper presented at CSIMS 2024 by Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Friends Research Institute (friendsresearch.org) Disclaimers: The opinions expressed in this article...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 8 August 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
A Kentucky statute, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.7305(2), which provides workers’ compensation benefits for occupational hearing loss only where a claimant’s binaural hearing impairment, converted to impairment of the whole person, results in impairment of more than eight percent pursuant to the AMA Guides, is unconstitutional, said the Court of Appeals of Kentucky. The Court saw no rational basis or substantial and justifiable reason for the disparate treatment of workers seeking PPD income benefits for occupational hearing loss resulting from traumatic ear injuries. The Court reasoned that traumatic injuries involving the ear were in all relevant and consequential respects the same as any other traumatic injury involving other organs, body parts and systems. Yet, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.7305(2) imposed a much higher impairment rating threshold on hearing loss claimants than Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.730(1)(b) and (c) required of all other traumatic injury claimants. The arbitrary difference in statutory treatment of similarly situated traumatic injury claimants violated the equal protection guarantees of the Federal and Kentucky Constitutions.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Napier v. Enterprise Mining Co., 2018 Ky. App. LEXIS 108 (Mar. 23, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 52.05.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law