Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Several months ago, an article in LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
By William Tappin, Esq., Law Offices of Tappin & Associates, Sierra Madre, CA There has been a lot of confusion with respect to whether ERISA preempts state laws regarding numerous programs, including...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
Observing that under 12 NYCRR 300.13[b][2][iv], an application for administrative review, must include proof of service upon "all necessary parties of interest," and that insurance carriers were included in the list of necessary parties of interest, but not their attorneys, a New York appellate court affirmed the Board's determination that a claimant was entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an alleged repetitive injury to his back, based upon the Board's decision, where the worker was unsuccessful at the law judge level, then filed an application for Board review, and served the carrier, but not the carrier's attorney. No one appeared at the review hearing to represent the carrier's interests. The appellate court cast aside its argument that its right to counsel had been unconstitutionally impinged. The court noted that the issue had not been raised at the hearing before the Board (of course, no one had been present to raise such an issue).
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Muller v. Square Deal Machining, Inc., 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2838 (3d Dept. May 7, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 124.05.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.