LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
A New York employer was not entitled to receive reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund pursuant to N.Y. Work. Comp. Law § 15(8)(d) unless it could establish three things: (1) that the injured worker had a preexisting permanent impairment that hindered job potential; (2) that the worker sustained a subsequent work-related injury, and (3) that the permanent disability caused by both conditions was materially and substantially greater than would have resulted from the work-related injury alone. The court agreed that the employer had failed to demonstrate that claimant’s preexisting asthma condition hindered, or was likely to hinder, her employability. The court acknowledged that the worker used an inhaler, but also observed that the worker was not under any work restrictions related to the condition. Her condition had not apparently affected her work. The court also observed that in earlier decisions, New York courts had held that preexisting conditions that are controlled by medication generally do not constitute a hindrance to employability.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Murphy v. Newburgh Enlarged City Sch. Dist., 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5332 (July 6, 2017)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 91.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law