CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES
Vol. 88, No. 5 May 2023
A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
In 2022 there were 7,490 wildfires in California. They burned 362,455 acres...
By Christopher Mahon
Should temporary workers be treated separately under workers’ compensation law due to additional employment and income risks they may incur after workplace injuries? A new study...
Here's a noteworthy panel decision where a family member conveyed essential information to the AME on behalf of the injured employee. The Lexis headnote is below.
CA - NOTEWORTHY PANEL DECISIONS...
Oakland, CA – Part II of a California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) research series on low- volume/high-cost drugs used to treat California injured workers identifies three Dermatological drugs...
The New York Workers' Compensation Board acted within its discretion when it awarded counsel fees of $1,000, instead of the $52,000 requested in a memorandum of law filed with the Board, held a state appellate court. The appellate court noted that any request for counsel fees in excess of $1,000 must be accompanied by a completed OC-400.1 application form specifying the dates and description of the services rendered on behalf of the claimant, as well as the total hours expended on the case. Here, no such form was provided and the Board accordingly awarded $1,000 in fees. The court noted that the Board had broad discretion in setting fees. Given counsel's failure to comply with the Board's regulatory rules, it was within the Board's discretion to award the significantly reduced fee.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Dzielski v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5669 (Oct. 8, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 133.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.