LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES
Vol. 89, No. 2 February 2024
A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
In the 1785 poem, To a Mouse , Robert Burns observed that the best...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
The struggle is real. How and when should Workers’ Compensation Judges (WCJs) apply the statute...
Oakland, CA - The number of inpatient hospitalizations in the California workers’ compensation system declined 51.1% between 2012 and 2022, spurred by declining claim volume, technological advances...
A New York appellate court reversed a decision by the state's Workers' Compensation Board that held an injured worker was not entitled to a scheduled loss of use (SLU) award for a severe tear in his hamstring muscle following a work-related accident. The court agreed with the Board that the state's 2018 Workers’ Compensation Guidelines for Determining Impairment (“guidelines”) failed to provide any specific level of impairment for hamstring tears, but the court said that silence was not determinative. The claimant's medical expert could reasonably rely upon the special consideration found in the guidelines related to quadricep ruptures. The court also noted that both orthopedists who had examined the claimant indicated he had reached MMI and that the hamstring tear had resulted in a permanent injury that could not be repaired surgically. The Board's finding was not supported by substantial evidence, held the appellate court.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Semrau v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA Inc., 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7850 (Dec. 17, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 86.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.