CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 7 July 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
Havanis v. Calif. Dept. of Transportation (Board Panel Decision) By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board I. Medical apportionment is not the...
By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
Where a New York employee’s job responsibilities included controverting workers’ compensation claims, his failure to notify his employer of an alleged work-related injury within the 30-day time period specified in N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 18 was unexcused. The employee’s two-month delay in notifying the employer, coupled with the employee’s failure to produce a relevant medical report, was sufficient to justify the Board’s decision to deny his claim. While the employee testified that he sought medical care within four days of his alleged work-related incident, he could not produce any medical record of such treatment.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Wright v. H & S Contr., Inc., Matter of Abdallah v. New York City Tr. Auth., 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1511 (Mar. 11, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 126.01.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.