CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 88, No. 5 May 2023 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board In 2022 there were 7,490 wildfires in California. They burned 362,455 acres...
By Christopher Mahon Should temporary workers be treated separately under workers’ compensation law due to additional employment and income risks they may incur after workplace injuries? A new study...
Here's a noteworthy panel decision where a family member conveyed essential information to the AME on behalf of the injured employee. The Lexis headnote is below. CA - NOTEWORTHY PANEL DECISIONS...
Oakland, CA – Part II of a California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) research series on low- volume/high-cost drugs used to treat California injured workers identifies three Dermatological drugs...
In an unpublished decision, a New Jersey court recently held that a workers’ compensation insurer was not entitled to pursue a subrogation claim for $900 in medical bills associated with injuries a police officer sustained when he was bitten on the hand by a Chihuahua sitting in the lap of a driver whose vehicle the officer had stopped for an alleged moving violation. The officer had asked the defendant driver for his driving credentials and when the officer reached into the vehicle to receive them from the driver, the little dog bit the officer on the hand, leaving three puncture wounds. The trial judge held the insurer did not have a cognizable claim because the officer could have recovered his medical expenses from his own automobile insurance carrier under the policy’s Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. The appellate court agreed. The court indicated that to trigger PIP coverage, there must be a “substantial nexus between the accident and the use of an automobile.” The appellate court said that it was “indisputably foreseeable that a dog is capable of biting someone who approaches a car, with its driver-side window open, while the dog is being held on the lap of the driver, within a foot or two of the person standing on the outside of the vehicle.”
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See New Jersey Intergovernmental Ins. Fund v. Sarokis, 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2671 (Nov. 4, 2013) [2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2671 (Nov. 4, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 117.01 [117.04]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
_____________________________________________________________________
Special Discount Price $79*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
PROMO CODE: WCEIA
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice. Discount cannot be combined with other offers. Expires 12/31/2013.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site