LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
Stressing that although closely related, the “arising out of” [the employment] and the “in the course of employment” concepts are separate and distinct elements of proving a workers' compensation claim, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina held that an employee could maintain a negligence action against his employer and a company nurse where he alleged that he suffered a stroke while at work and the nurse's alleged negligent treatment exacerbated his stroke-related injuries. According to the court, an employee seeking medical care from a medical professional at his or her workplace was not the sort of occurrence that created an injury by accident under the North Carolina Act. Nor did the injury arise out of the employment.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Jackson v. Timken Co., 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 477 (May 21, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 113.08
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see