By Thomas A. Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Industrially injured workers in California are entitled to receive...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 88, No. 9 September 2023 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It is well-settled law that federally recognized Indian Tribes have...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are solely those of the authors and are not the opinions of the Department of Industrial Relations, Division...
Finding a person's common law rights could be limited, but not eliminated, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held a provision in the state's Workers' Compensation Act [12 O.S. 2011 §§1053A] that allowed death benefits only to a spouse, child, or legal guardian--if the guardian was dependent on the employee-- and which, therefore, barred the claim of a non-dependent parent of an adult, unmarried, and childless employee who sustained fatal injuries in a work-related incident, was unconstitutional. Accordingly, the court reversed a trial court's decision granting the employer summary judgment on the basis that the parents' wrongful death action was barred by exclusivity. The high court acknowledged that a wrongful death action was a creature of statute and that it was derivative of the rights that the deceased might have had had he survived. It said, however, that prior to the overhaul of the state's Workers' Compensation Law in 2014, a parent would have been able to recover. It was constitutionally impermissible, therefore, for her right to be abrogated.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Whipple v. Phillips & Sons Trucking, 2020 OK 75, 2020 Okla. LEXIS 81 (Sept. 21, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 100.05.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.