CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 88, No. 5 May 2023 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board In 2022 there were 7,490 wildfires in California. They burned 362,455 acres...
By Christopher Mahon Should temporary workers be treated separately under workers’ compensation law due to additional employment and income risks they may incur after workplace injuries? A new study...
Here's a noteworthy panel decision where a family member conveyed essential information to the AME on behalf of the injured employee. The Lexis headnote is below. CA - NOTEWORTHY PANEL DECISIONS...
Oakland, CA – Part II of a California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) research series on low- volume/high-cost drugs used to treat California injured workers identifies three Dermatological drugs...
Where a South Carolina law firm negotiated a mediated $120,000 settlement on behalf of an injured worker, was fired one day after the successful mediation, and sent as many as four communications to the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission advising that it claimed an interest in the settlement proceeds, yet received no notice of a hearing at which Commission approved the agreement—without providing for any award of attorney fees—the firm could not sue the Commission for its alleged negligence. The appellate court said the the firm had not properly preserved the issue as to whether or not the Commission’s action was a ministerial act, as opposed to a judicial one. The firm had also failed to allege sufficiently that it sought a ruling on due process grounds. Based on the foregoing, the court held the circuit court did not err in dismissing the action.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Kelaher, Connell & Conner, P.C. v. S.C. Workers’ Comp. Comm’n, 2021 S.C. App. LEXIS 107 (Sept. 8, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 133.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.