LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Legal Insights Contributing Author A September 2024 study from the Workers Compensation Research Institute indicates that workers represented by an attorney in workers’...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board “Substantial Medical Evidence” is a ubiquitous catch-all phrase. When does it exist? When...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 90, No. 1 January 2025 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, with a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Cases of “first impression” seldom wander into our workers’ compensation world. When...
A trial court properly apportioned 10 percent of a permanently and totally disabled worker’s disability to the Second Injury Fund where it found that the worker sustained a 90 percent PPD as a result of a shoulder and arm injury, but also found that when combined with the worker’s prior medical issues, which included congestive heart failure, the worker was not capable of working. The employer did not actively dispute the PTD determination, but argued that but for the employee’s preexisting conditions, he could have returned to work and that, therefore, the court should have apportioned more of the PTD to the Second Injury Fund. The Special Appellate Panel acknowledged that the preexisting conditions influenced or discouraged the employee from seeking surgery that might have allowed him to return to work. The panel indicated, however, that the trial court had appropriately considered the effect of the prior medical issues on the worker’s ability to return to work.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Tankersley v. Batesville Casket Co., 2018 Tenn. LEXIS 16 (Jan. 26, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 91.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law