Position paper presented at CSIMS 2024 by Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Friends Research Institute (friendsresearch.org) Disclaimers: The opinions expressed in this article...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 8 August 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The June 13, 2024 edition of the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2024. The first...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It is well understood that the California Insurance Guarantee Association...
The Supreme Court of Vermont held that a workers' compensation award of PPD benefits, based on damage to the C4-6 levels of claimant's cervical spine, did not preclude a subsequent award of PPD benefits, more than six years later, for damage to the C3-4 levels of claimant's spine that arose, over time, from the same work injury. The Commissioner determined that since the claim also involved claimant’s cervical spine, it amounted to a request to modify the prior PPD award and was time-barred (under 21 V.S.A. § 668, an approved award may only be modified within six years of the date of the award). The high court concluded that the specific language of the initial PPD award did not purport to encompass injury to other levels of claimant's cervical spine beyond the C4-6 levels. Accordingly, claimant was not so much seeking to modify the prior PPD award but, rather, sought PPD benefits for physical damage not encompassed within the previous PPD award. Her claim was, therefore, timely. Vermont’s statute of limitations for filing a claim—six years from the accrual of the claim [see 21 V.S.A. § 660(a)—is one of the longest in the nation.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Diamond v. Burlington Free Press, 2017 VT 93, 2017 Vt. LEXIS 111 (Oct. 6, 2017)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 131.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law