LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis...
Oakland, CA -- The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has issued the 2025 assessments that workers’ compensation insurers are required to collect from policyholders to cover the...
Oakland – Alex Swedlow has announced his plans to retire as President of the Oakland-based California Workers' Compensation Institute (CWCI) effective August 2025. Mr. Swedlow’s retirement...
Oakland - A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) analysis that examines how medical inflation impacts allowable fees under the California workers’ compensation Official Medical...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It’s a problem. Petitions for Reconsideration (Recon) are losing their way and delaying their arrival...
In a split decision, the Supreme Court of Virginia held that the trial court erred when it sustained a plea in bar and dismissed a wrongful death action filed against a property owner by the estate of a general contractor’s employee who was killed in a construction accident. The majority held that in order to be immune from the suit, the deceased employee must have been engaged in the “trade, business or occupation” of the owner under Va. Code Ann. § 65.2-302(A). The majority indicated the decedent’s construction work was not part of the owner’s trade or business, which was to develop real estate. The owner was not, therefore the decedent’s statutory employer and the owner was subject to civil suit. Two justices joined in a dissent, arguing that the majority had (a) terminated the ability of injured workers to seek workers' compensation from developers like that in the instant case in a manner contrary to the remedial purposes of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act and (b) exposed such developers to common law tort liability that was completely at odds with applicable statutory and case law.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Rodriquez v. Leesburg Business Park, 2014 Va. LEXIS 25 (Feb. 27, 2014) [2014 Va. LEXIS 25 (Feb. 27, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 111.04 [111.04]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site