Oakland – A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study finds that average paid losses on California workers’ compensation lost-time claims fell immediately after legislative...
By Thomas A. Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Industrially injured workers in California are entitled to receive...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 88, No. 9 September 2023 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It is well-settled law that federally recognized Indian Tribes have...
Where a Wyoming employee, after he had completed a shift, injured his knuckle when he struck it on a metal locker in the employee locker room, and the small cut on his finger subsequently became infected with Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (Strep A)--more commonly known as flesh-eating bacteria--requiring hospitalization and aggressive treatment for more than a month to control the bacteria, the claim was not barred by the “illness or communicable disease” exclusion set forth in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-102(a)(xi)(A) (LexisNexis 2019). The Court stressed that the Office of Administrative Hearings had improperly identified the employee's "injury." The injury was not the contraction of the flesh-eating bacterial disease. It was the original knuckle injury. The employee had sufficiently shown his original injury occurred in connection with his work. The bacterial was a consequential condition that developed as a result.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See In re Worker’s Comp. Claim of Vinson, 2020 WY 126, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 146 (Sept. 28, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, §§ 10.02, 51.04.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.