• Li v. Yellow Cab Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co. Supreme Court of California March 31, 1975 L.A. No. 30277 Opinion  [*808]   [**1229]   [***861]   [****2]  In this case we address the grave and recurrent question whether we should judicially declare no longer applicable in California...

  • Chapman v. Cal.

    Chapman v. Cal. Supreme Court of the United States December 7-8, 1966, Argued ; February 20, 1967, Decided No. 95 Opinion  [*18]   [***707]   [**825]  MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioners, Ruth Elizabeth Chapman and Thomas...

  • FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB

    Petitioner FedEx operated a package-delivery terminal in Hartford, Connecticut. Drivers for FedEx delivered packages along certain "routes" designated by FedEx. A driver might serve a single route or multiple routes. Both single-route and multi...

  • Fish v. L.A. Dodgers Baseball Club

    Plaintiffs' son was struck by a foul ball while watching a major league baseball game, knocking him unconscious for approximately one minute. He was treated by the doctor who operated the emergency first aid station at the stadium who, after a brief...

  • MLex® Special Report: AI and Data Privacy & Security

    All eyes on AI This Special Report brings together MLex's extensive coverage of the IAPP's Global Privacy Summit. Download the Report This must-read Special Report brings together...

  • State v. Hansen

    In January 1988, defendant Michael Ross Hansen was convicted of a felony and was sentenced to 24 months in prison. Several months after his release, defendant began contacting attorneys in order to bring a civil action against the State, the Judge, his...

  • Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd

    Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1984, Argued ; March 4, 1985, Decided No. 83-1708 Opinion  [*214]   [***161]   [**1239]  JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. The question presented is whether...

  • Zuk v. E. Pa. Psychiatric Inst. of the Med. Coll. of Pa.

    Plaintiff claimed that the defendant was infringing his copyright in certain films because defendant did not deliver to plaintiff certain copies of the films allegedly in defendant's possession. Plaintiff had never registered a copyright in the films...

  • Deatrick v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA

    Deatrick v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA United States District Court for the Northern District of California October 20, 2014, Decided; October 20, 2014, Filed Case No. 13-cv-05016-JST Opinion ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE...

  • Todd v. Exxon Corp.

    Roberta Todd alleged that the oil companies regularly shared detailed information regarding compensation paid to nonunion managerial, professional, and technical (MPT) employees and used this information in setting the salaries at artificially low levels...