Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    State v. Curtis

    The State charged the defendant with criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree under Minn. Stat. § 609.345, subd. 1(d) (2018). Defendant’s counsel suggested to the district court that defendant was not mentally competent. In response, the...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Phoenix Rest. Group, Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In re Phoenix Rest. Group, Inc.)

    Phoenix Rest. Group, Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In re Phoenix Rest. Group, Inc.) United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division August 8, 2007, Filed Case No. 301-12036, Chapter 11, Bankruptcy Adv. No. 03-0568A...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Ba v. United States

    The victim obtained a civil protection order (CPO) against defendant. The CPO ordered defendant not to assault, threaten, harass, or physically abuse the victim in any manner, to stay at least 100 feet away from the victim, her home, her workplace, and...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    AK Futures LLC v. Boyd St. Distro, LLC

    AK Futures LLC v. Boyd St. Distro, LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 18, 2022, Argued and Submitted, Las Vegas, Nevada; May 19, 2022, Filed No. 21-56133 Opinion D.M. FISHER, Circuit Judge: AK Futures LLC, a manufacturer of...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Gavrilides Mgmt. Co., LLC v. Mich. Ins. Co.

    Gavrilides Mgmt. Co., LLC v. Mich. Ins. Co. Court of Appeals of Michigan February 1, 2022, Decided No. 354418 Opinion Per Curium . Plaintiffs, the corporate entities that operate two restaurants in the mid-Michigan area, appeal by right the trial court's...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Exclusivity Agreements: Should Sellers Play the Field?

    Buyers should be hesitant to invest time and financial resources in transaction due diligence without a seller agreeing to a period of exclusivity. Without exclusivity, a buyer risks that a seller will negotiate with other bidders and treat the buyer...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Haralson v. Jones Truck Line

    Two truck drivers were driving at night. The first driver signaled to the second driver that it was safe for him to pass the first driver. As he was attempting to pass the first driver, the second driver's vehicle struck and killed a pedestrian walking...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Manchester v. National Gypsum Co.

    Manchester v. National Gypsum Co. United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island May 30, 1986 C.A. No. 84-0443 P Opinion  [*647]  OPINION AND ORDER PETTINE, Senior Judge. This case is a diversity action brought by the City of Manchester...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Me. Cmty. Health Options v. United States

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act established online exchanges where insurers could sell their healthcare plans. The now-expired “Risk Corridors” program aimed to limit the plans' profits and losses during the exchanges'...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    IBM Corp. v. United States

    IBM Corp. v. United States United States Court of Federal Claims March 10, 1997, FILED No. 95-828T Opinion  [*600]  ORDER This matter is before the court on plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order Directing the Return of Four Privileged Documents...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis