Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    SA Music, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    SA Music, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington June 12, 2020, Decided; June 12, 2020, Filed CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00105-BAT (Arlen Docket); CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00106-BAT (Henderson Docket); CASE NO. 2:20...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Gitson v. Trader Joe's Co.

    Gitson v. Trader Joe's Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California October 4, 2013, Decided; October 4, 2013, Filed Case No. 13-cv-01333-WHO Opinion ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Carpenter v. Double R Cattle Co.

    Plaintiff appellants are homeowners who live near a cattle feedlot owned and operated by respondents. Appellants filed a complaint in March, 1978, alleging that the feedlot had been expanded in 1977 to accommodate the feeding of approximately 9,000 cattle...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    DeRice v. S.D. Warren Co.

    The present case involved a consolidated case involving an injury that occurred before 1993. In both cases, petitions for relief were filed and submitted to mediation after the effective date of title 39-A. Maine Workers' Compensation Act of 1992...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Bragdon

    Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Bragdon United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit October 9, 1992, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California ; August 24, 1995, Filed Nos. 91-16397, 91-16399 Opinion  [*498]  OPINION HUG, Circuit...
  • APW
    APW
    • over 4 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Property Disputes

    Section 21 notice valid if correct notice period given but the exact prescribed form not used?

    I have been instructed by a landlord in connection with a residential Assured Shorthold Tenancy dating to December 2018 and who served a Section 21 Notice on the 19th June 2020. This provides the requisite 3 months notice as per the Covid amendments at...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Freeman v. Complex Computing Co.

    In September 1993, Plaintiff Daniel Freeman and defendant Complex Computing Company (C3) entered into an agreement pursuant to which Freeman agreed to sell C3's computer software in exchange for commissions based on sales or licenses made to customers...
  • InfoPro Community Manager
    InfoPro Community Manager
    • over 5 years ago
    • Infopro
    • LexisNexis Information Professional Update

    Docket research is faster and easier with new CourtLink® on Lexis Advance®

    LexisNexis® has redesigned the CourtLink® service to give you more convenient access to the features you use most often.* The industry’s largest collection of dockets and documents is now available on Lexis Advance, including access to over...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Napout

    United States v. Napout United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York March 10, 2017, Decided; March 10, 2017, Filed 15 CR 252 (S-1) (PKC) (RML) Opinion MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEVY, United States Magistrate Judge: On August 3, 2016,...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Linder v. Ins. Claims Consultants, Inc.

    The insureds hired the adjusters to resolve a coverage dispute with their homeowners’ insurer. A settlement was reached, but the insurer delayed payment. The adjusters sued the insureds for their contractual commission. The insureds filed a counterclaim...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis