Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1984, Argued ; March 4, 1985, Decided No. 83-1708 Opinion  [*214]   [***161]   [**1239]  JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. The question presented is whether...

Creative Hospitality Ventures, Inc. v. United States Liab. Ins. Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit September 30, 2011, Decided; September 30, 2011, Filed No. 11-11781 Non-Argument Calendar Opinion  [*370]  PER CURIAM: Plaintiff...

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Supreme Court of the United States March 22, 2021, Argued; June 23, 2021, Decided No. 20-107. Opinion Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court. ] A California regulation grants labor organizations a “right...

Butts v. Royal Vendors Inc. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia June 9, 1998, Submitted ; July 2, 1998, Filed No. 24743 Opinion  [**912]   [*449]  Per Curiam: 1  [***3]  Appellant Royal Vendors, Inc. seeks a reversal of the order of the Circuit...

Benenson v. Comm'r United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit April 10, 2018, Argued; December 14, 2018, Decided No. 16-2953-ag Opinion  [*692]  Reena Raggi , Circuit Judge : At issue on this appeal is a decision of the United States Tax...

Benenson v. Comm'r United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit April 6, 2018, Decided No. 16-2066, No. 16-2067 Opinion  [*513]  STAHL, Circuit Judge . Clement Benenson ("Clement") and James Benenson III ("James III") appeal...

The tax and regulatory issues surrounding worker classification of individuals who work and live in different states has been around for decades. The COVID-19 pandemic and its ensuing stay-at-home orders brought an almost overnight shift to remote work...

Do you need to know the latest and greatest on amend and extend provisions in credit agreements? Review this Market Trends practice note to gain insights on current market trends in amend and extend provisions found in publicly filed credit agreements...

The recent motion to dismiss decision in FTC v. Facebook highlights the need for plaintiffs to prove monopoly power as an element of their Section 2 cases. While market share is an important indicator, other types of proof can be introduced. READ NOW...

Plaintiff claimed that the defendant was infringing his copyright in certain films because defendant did not deliver to plaintiff certain copies of the films allegedly in defendant's possession. Plaintiff had never registered a copyright in the films...