Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu

    Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit April 17, 2019, Decided 2018-1710, 2018-1711 Opinion  [*919]  Bryson , Circuit Judge . Purdue Pharma L.P., P.F. Laboratories, Inc., and Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. (collectively...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Gurolla

    United States v. Gurolla United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 3, 2003, 1 Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California; June 23, 2003, Filed No. 99-50657, No. 00-50188, No. 01-50579 Opinion REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Appellants Alfonso...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Virzi v. Grand Trunk Warehouse & Cold Storage Co.

    Virzi v. Grand Trunk Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division September 29, 1983 Civil Action No. 82-71223 Opinion  [*508]  BY Judge Horace W. Gilmore This case raises an important...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Laufer v. Arpan LLC

    Laufer v. Arpan LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit March 29, 2022, Filed No. 20-14846 Opinion  [*1270]  NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: Another day, another standing case. In this iteration, we have to decide whether an ADA plaintiff suffered...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    N.C. State Bar v. Sossomon

    N.C. State Bar v. Sossomon Court of Appeals of North Carolina March 19, 2009, Heard in the Court of Appeals; June 2, 2009, Filed NO. COA08-1248 Opinion  [*262]   [**912]  Appeal by defendant from a disciplinary order entered on 15 April 2008 by the Disciplinary...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Himes v. Safeway Ins. Co.

    Himes v. Safeway Ins. Co. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, Department A March 27, 2003, Filed 1 CA-CV 01-0532, 1 CA-CV 02-0410, (Consolidated) Opinion  [*34]   [**77]  BARKER , Judge P1 We examine in this opinion 1 the burden of proof and legal...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    United States v. Gilmore

    Respondent sued for refund of part of the income taxes paid by him for the years 1953 and 1954, on the ground that legal expenses incurred by him in defending divorce litigation with his former wife were deductible under § 23 (a)(2) of the Internal...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    McGirt v. Oklahoma

    McGirt v. Oklahoma Supreme Court of the United States May 11, 2020, Argued; July 9, 2020, Decided No. 18-9526. Opinion Justice Gorsuch delivered  [**6]  the opinion of the Court. On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their...
  • InfoPro Community Manager
    InfoPro Community Manager
    • over 6 years ago
    • Infopro
    • LexisNexis Information Professional Update

    Combine the Lexis Advance® sources and research tools you use most on your own custom pages

    Now it’s easy to keep the Lexis Advance® sources and tools you use most at your fingertips—all on one page that’s organized your way—with the recently released Custom Pages feature. Quickly set up one or more Custom Pages,...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Menora Mivtachim Ins. Ltd. v. Frutarom Indus.

    Menora Mivtachim Ins. Ltd. v. Frutarom Indus. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit February 10, 2022, Argued; September 30, 2022, Decided No. 21-1076 Opinion  [*791]  Park, Circuit Judge : International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. ...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis