Plaintiff administrator filed an action against defendant parents and alleged that the parents were negligent in failing to supervise a party given by their son. As a result of the parents' alleged negligence, their son was involved in an accident...

Persons found to violate ordinances multiple times could be barred from all City property. If a homeless person is found on City property after receiving an exclusion order, they are subject to criminal prosecution for trespass.

Plaintiff minor son, by his mother as next friend, sought review of a judgment rendered in favor of defendants, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fireworks explosion that caused the son to lose a hand.

Respondent state bar proceeded against appellant title insurance company charging that it engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing documents for real estate sales transactions. The trial court enjoined appellant from preparing sale agreements...

Respondents filed a putative class action against the Federal Bureau of Investigation and certain Government officials, claiming that the Government subjected them and other Muslims to illegal surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act...

The son of the plaintiffs, facing financial difficulties, asked his parents to sign a statement of intent to refinance their business. Despite their attorney's advice, they did. The bank president threatened to prosecute them if they didn't sign...

Plaintiff ex-wife appealed a judgment which pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 597 barred further prosecution of her action against defendant ex-husband for prospective and retroactive enforcement of his obligations under a separate maintenance decree...

Two defendants moved to suppress evidence obtained during custodial interrogations conducted abroad by United States law enforcement representatives.

The Government initiated removal proceedings against Patel and his wife due to their illegal entry. Patel petitioned the Eleventh Circuit for review, where a panel of that court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his claim.

An opioid manufacturer appealed a $465 million verdict following a bench trial in a public nuisance lawsuit. The district court held the opioid manufacturer liable under Oklahoma's public nuisance statute for its prescription opioid marketing campaign...