Respondents filed a complaint in the district court for deprivation of property without due process of law under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 against defendant corporation and judge, but the district court dismissed the motion because the judge was immune...

Plaintiff applicants, filed suit against defendant state officials, alleging violations of due process and the LIHEAA. The district court found a denial of the right to a fair hearing and inadequate notice.

Defendants, new limited liability company (LLC) first and second members and LLC, sought review of the decision from the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the ruling of the trial court that the first and second members had engaged in an illegal transaction...

The customer, who purchased a gift, met her daughter at a nearby restaurant. She parked her car at the store's edge but fell into a hole. She claimed she didn't move to the restaurant parking lot, claiming she didn't want her car hit. The...

Petitioners challenged their criminal convictions for conspiracy to defraud the United States by accepting payoffs in exchange for dismissing criminal charges against certain defendants. Two of the accused were assistant U.S. attorneys in charge of prosecuting...

The trial court certified three stipulated subclasses, and found that enforceable contracts existed between each of the students and the university and that the university breached those contracts by increasing the educational fees and the professional...

Plaintiff and defendants purchased seventy shares of stock. As a part of the transaction the parties agreed to use their best endeavors for the purpose of continuing as directors of the company. Defendants argued that the contract was void.

Appellant moved for a directed verdict based on the failure of the State to prove that A.S. resisted sexual intercourse and that her resistance was overcome by force. The district court denied the motion. The jury convicted Jones of both counts of rape...

Appellee, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, determined that the company's construction plan was likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the arroyo southwestern toad, which appellee, the Secretary of the Interior, had listed as an...

Appellant was injured during a baseball game at respondent's baseball stadium when she was struck by a batted ball while seated in an unscreened area behind first base. She had occupied identical seats before, thus she knew that her seat was located...