Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United Cannabis Corp. v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.

    United Cannabis Corp. v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. United States District Court for the District of Colorado April 17, 2019, Decided; April 17, 2019, Filed Civil Action No. 18-cv-1922-WJM-NYW Opinion ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EARLY MOTION FOR PARTIAL...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Magill v. Ford Motor Co.

    Magill v. Ford Motor Co. Supreme Court of Colorado September 12, 2016, Decided Supreme Court Case No. 15SA332 Opinion  [**1035]  en banc CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.  [*1]  We issued a rule to show cause in this case to review...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Figueroa v. BNSF Ry. Co.

    Figueroa v. BNSF Ry. Co. Supreme Court of Oregon March 2, 2017, Argued and Submitted 1 ; March 2, 2017, Decided SC S063929 Opinion  [**1020]   [*144]  En Banc KISTLER, J. Oregon requires that foreign corporations doing business in this state appoint a...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Diamond v. Chakrabarty

    Diamond v. Chakrabarty Supreme Court of the United States March 17, 1980, Argued ; June 16, 1980, Decided No. 79-136 Opinion  [*305]   [***147]   [**2205]  MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to determine...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Bank v. Lenox Fin. Mortg. Corp.

    Bank v. Lenox Fin. Mortg. Corp. United States District Court for the District of Minnesota March 2, 2017, Decided; March 2, 2017, Filed Civil No. 16-2387(DSD/DTS) Opinion ORDER This matter is before the court upon the motion to dismiss by defendant Lenox...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    2021 Pat. App. LEXIS 2795

    2021 Pat. App. LEXIS 2795 Patent Trial and Appeal Board May 20, 2021, Decided Appeal 2020-005549 ; Application 14/698,698 ; Technology Center 1600 USPTO Bd of Patent Appeals & Interferences; Patent Trial & Appeal Bd Decs. Opinion POLLOCK, Administrative...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    All. for Bio-Integrity v. Shalala

    On May 29, 1992, the FDA published a "Statement of Policy: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties" (Statement of Policy). In the Statement of Policy, FDA announced that the agency would presume that foods produced through the rDNA process were...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Mathers v. Texaco, Inc.

    The applicant-appellant, Texaco, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Texaco, filed applications with the State Engineer for permits to appropriate 700-acre feet of water per year from the Lea County Underground Water Basin. Upon the hearing of the applications...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Bellevue Hosp. Ctr. v. Leavitt

    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was the agency within Department of Health and Humans Services' ("HHS") responsible for administering the Medicare program. The hospitals challenged the implementation of a statutory requirement...
  • Mary Anne Peck
    Mary Anne Peck
    • over 3 years ago
    • Capitol Journal
    • State Net

    Labor Week: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Exemptions in AL, UT; Digital Workplace Monitoring Notification in NY & More

    AL Enacts Law Restricting COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates: Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) signed into law a bill ( SB 9 b ) requiring employers in the state to exempt from COVID-19 vaccination requirements “any employee who has completed and submitted...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis