Copyright & Trademark Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • Top 10 Cases
  • Top 10 Copyright Cases for the Month of April 2012

05/03/2012 07:46:00 AM EST

Top 10 Copyright Cases for the Month of April 2012

1. L.A. Printex Indus., Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc., No. 10-56187, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7079, December 5, 2011, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, April 9, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Plaintiff's sale of 50,000 yards of fabric with a copyrighted floral fabric print design to fabric converters created a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether plaintiff's design was widely disseminated and hence that there was a "reasonable possibility" that defendants had an opportunity to view and copy the design.

CORE TERMS:  registration, fabric, flower, similarity, color, summary judgment, substantially similar, shirts, collection, supplementary ...

 

2. Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., Docket No. 10-3270-cv, Docket No. 10-3342-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6909; 102 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1283, October 18, 2011, Argued, April 5, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Although 17 U.S.C.S. § 512(c) safe harbor required knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity, reasonable jury could find that defendant had actual knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity on its website and it was error to interpret "right and ability to control infringing activity" to require item-specific knowledge.

CORE TERMS:  provider, infringing, safe harbor, infringement, video, user's, awareness, actual knowledge, network, website ...

 

3. Looney Ricks Kiss Architects, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. 11-30121, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6730, April 4, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  District court erred in determining that insurers had no duty to provide coverage to insureds in a copyright infringement action on the basis of breach of contract exclusions in the policies because Louisiana applied a "but for" test to determine coverage, and the claim under the federal copyright laws would exist even in the absence of a contract.

CORE TERMS:  coverage, breach of contract, insurer, duty to defend, architect, insured, summary judgment, apartments, owe, insurance policies ...

 

4. BottleHood, Inc. v. Bottle Mill, CASE NO. 11-cv-2910-MMA (MDD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57381, April 23, 2012, Decided, April 23, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  copyright infringement, trademark, glassware, trademark infringement, infringing, unfair competition, secondary meaning, infringement, registration, Lanham Act ...

 

5. Sanrio Co. v. J.I.K. Accessories, No. C-09-0440 EMC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55280, April 19, 2012, Decided, April 19, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  default judgment, counterfeit, injunction, statutory damages, trademark, infringement, trademark infringement, retail stores, infringe, weighs ...

 

6. Dominic v. Delaloye, 12-CV-1551 (NGG) (RML), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54023, April 16, 2012, Decided, April 17, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  In infringement suit under Copyright Act of 1976 involving an unfinished documentary, copyright holder was not entitled to preliminary injunction, because, inter alia, it appeared that the alleged similarities between the parties' works substantially related not to protected aesthetic expressions but to unprotectible ideas and facts.

CORE TERMS:  film, documentary, similarity, trailer, clips, likelihood of success, preliminary injunction, quotation marks omitted, infringement, protectible ...

 

7. Profoot, Inc. v. MSD Consumer Care, Inc., Civ. No. 11-7079, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51888, April 11, 2012, Decided, April 12, 2012, Filed,  NOT FOR PUBLICATION [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  counterclaim, trade dress, infringement, amend, Lanham Act, circle, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, packaging, cross-motion ...

 

8. CineTel Films, Inc. v. Doe, Civil No. JFM 8:11-cv-02438, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47701, April 4, 2012, Decided, April 4, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Where plaintiffs alleged that hundreds of unidentified defendants used file-sharing protocol to illegally obtain plaintiffs' copyrighted motion picture, joinder of defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2) was improper because  alleged infringement was committed by unrelated defendants, through independent actions, at different times and locations.

CORE TERMS:  joinder, subpoena, copyright infringement, identifying information, protocol, severed, subscriber, putative, personal jurisdiction, discovery ...

 

9. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. United Fabrics Int'l, Inc., 11 Civ. 2574 (CM)(JCF), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48046, April 4, 2012, Decided, April 4, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  registration, discovery, disclosures, summary judgment, counterclaim, collection, fabric, partial, invoices, plural ...

 

10. Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Doe, Civil No. JFM 8:12-cv-00095, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48420, April 4, 2012, Decided, April 4, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Court severed all but two doe defendants because merely alleging that Doe defendants all used the same file-sharing protocol, to conduct copyright infringement of plaintiff's film without any indication that they acted in concert failed to satisfy the arising out of the same series of transactions or occurrences requirement.

CORE TERMS:  joinder, subpoena, copyright infringement, protocol, swarm', copyrighted, joined, identifying information, downloading, occurrence ...

....

Lexis.com subscribers can explore/search Copyright Law resources on Lexis.com or access any of these Mathew Bender Copyright Law publications:

Non-subscribers can purchase Copyright Law treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications from the LexisNexis Bookstore  

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.


Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: