Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of August 30th, 2009

1. Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Julien's Auction House LLC, No. 07-55614, No. 08-55052, No. 08-55268, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19698, July 9, 2009, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, September 1, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Julien's Auction House LLC

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Julien's Auction House LLC

2. Palnik v. Westlake Entm't, Inc., No. 09-3062, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 09a0620n.06;, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19417; 2009 FED App. 0620N (6th Cir.), August 31, 2009, Filed, NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION. SIXTH CIRCUIT RULE 28(g) LIMITS CITATION TO SPECIFIC SITUATIONS. PLEASE SEE RULE 28(g) BEFORE CITING IN A PROCEEDING IN A COURT IN THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. IF CITED, A COPY MUST BE SERVED ON OTHER PARTIES AND THE COURT. THIS NOTICE IS TO BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED IF THIS DECISION IS REPRODUCED.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Palnik v. Westlake Entm't, Inc.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Palnik v. Westlake Entm't, Inc.

3. Hilton v. Hallmark Cards, No. 08-55443, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19571, May 6, 2009, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, August 31, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Hilton v. Hallmark Cards

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Hilton v. Hallmark Cards

4. FM. Indus., Inc. v. Citicorp Credit Servs., Case No: 07 C 1794, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78992, September 3, 2009, Decided, September 3, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of FM. Indus., Inc. v. Citicorp Credit Servs.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

5. Want Ad Digest, Inc. v. Display Adver., Inc., 1:08-CV-189 (GLS/DRH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79012, September 3, 2009, Decided, September 3, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Want Ad Digest, Inc. v. Display Adver., Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

6. Sony BMG Music Entm't v. Rezabala, No. CIV S-08-1520 MCE GGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79081, September 3, 2009, Decided, September 3, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Sony BMG Music Entm't v. Rezabala

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

7. Corbis Corp. v. Starr, Case No. 3:07CV3741, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79626, September 2, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Corbis Corp. v. Starr

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

8. Plan Pros, Inc. v. Torczon, 8:08CV136, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78168, September 1, 2009, Decided, September 1, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Plan Pros, Inc. v. Torczon

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

9. Pipe Wrap LLC v. P3 Indus. Techs. INC., CIVIL ACTION NO. H-08-0822, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77506, August 31, 2009, Decided, August 31, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Pipe Wrap LLC v. P3 Indus. Techs. Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

10. Mei, LLC v. Integral Applied Tech., Inc., Civil No. 08-6046-AA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79649, August 31, 2009, Decided, September 1, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Mei, LLC v. Integral Applied Tech., Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Comment