LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
In another example of why women hesitate to bring sexual
harassment claims, a judge
has ordered twenty two women who are bringing a sexual harassment claim to
turn over their cell phones and social networking passwords to attorneys for
their former employers. The judge will allow these attorneys to examine their
chats, text messages, tweets, private messages, pictures, posts and emails.
The former employer claims that they need the information to explore whether
the women used the words they claim offended them, their romantic lives, and
other information to determine whether they were indeed subjected to unwelcome
sexual harassment and, if so, the extent of their emotional damage.
The big smoking gun the employer pointed to was a shirt one of the women wore
in a photo with the word, "Cu**" on it. Apparently, if you wear such
a shirt on your own time, no matter your intent, you have extended an open
invitation to all your supervisors and male coworkers to sexually harass you.
Sort of like the argument that African-American employees who use the n-word
can't be offended when someone else uses it toward them.
The judge said this about his reasoning: "I view this content logically as
though each class member had a file folder titled "Everything About Me," which
they have voluntarily shared with others. If there are documents in this folder
that contain information that is relevant or may lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence relating to this lawsuit, the presumption is that it should
This is a case where twenty-two women say they were propositioned, fondled, and
subjected to unwanted comments by their manager. Twenty-two! That means this
employer is claiming twenty-two women are all making up the same story. That
twenty-two women asked for this behavior.
Which brings me back to the "she asked for it" defense. Too many
judges in sexual harassment cases allow the harasser to claim that a woman's
use of four-letter words, her clothing, or her sex life with others mean that
she wasn't offended when she was groped, insulted or grabbed by her supervisor.
If a woman isn't a delicate flower, blushing at the merest hint of foul
language or the mention of sex, she's apparently an open target.
So, ladies, open your diaries, love letters, private email, intimate
discussions with friends and anything else in your life. If you are bringing a
sexual harassment claim, your harasser can see it all so they can claim you
asked for it.
I have to say this to management-side employment lawyers who use this tactic to
humiliate sexual harassment victims: "Have you no sense of decency, sir?
At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"
See more employment law posts on Donna
Ballman's blog, Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home.
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.