Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Excerpt:
The Supreme Court rejected the efforts of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") effort to extend the five-year statute of limitations for imposing a civil penalty by engrafting a discovery exception onto the statute. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a unanimous Court, held that under Section 2462 of Title 28, the statute of limitations begins when there is a cause of action. The decision is a straight forward reading of the statutory language. Gabelli v. SEC, No. 11-1274 (S. Ct., Decided February 27, 2013) [an enhanced version of this opinion is available to lexis.com subscribers]. I. Background: The Case The Commission's case centered on alleged false statements by Marc Gabelli, the portfolio manager of Gabelli Global Growth Fund ("Fund"), and Bruce Alpert, the COO of the Fund's adviser, Gabelli Funds, LLC. From 1999 until 2002, the defendants permitted trader Headstart Advisers, Ltd. ("Headstart") to engage in "time zone arbitrage" according to the SEC, a form of market timing. At the same time, defendants banned others from utilizing the practice. The arrangement with Headstart was not disclosed to the Fund's board of directors who were thus deceived. Even after Headstart halted the practice, the defendants continued to mislead the board and investors, according to the SEC. The Commission filed its complaint in April 2008. The underlying investigation began in the Fall of 2003 following the publicized inquiry of the New York Attorney General into market timing. At one point the SEC sought tolling agreements. The complaint alleged violations of Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Advisers Act Sections 206(1) and (2).
Access the full version of this article with your lexis.com ID. Additional fees may be incurred.
If you do not have a lexis.com ID, you can purchase this commentary and additional Emerging Issues Commentaries from the LexisNexis Store.
Lexis.com subscribers can access the complete set of Emerging Issues Analyses for Securities Law and the Securities Area of Law page.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.