Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Amended Labeling Claims Meet UCL Pleading Standards, California Federal Judge Says

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Amended Labeling Claims Meet UCL Pleading Standards, California Federal Judge Says

SAN FRANCISCO - A consumer's revised allegations that he relied on a juicemaker's false and misleading "No Sugar Added" statement when deciding what 100 percent apple juice product to buy and that he will buy less of the product in the future due to the misrepresentation are sufficient for his claims to proceed under California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other statutes, a federal judge held April 8 (Mohammed Rahman v. Mott's LLP, No. 13-3482, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49169).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®