SAN FRANCISCO - Victims and surviving family members of the June 14 shooting at a San Francisco United Parcel Service Inc. warehouse filed multiple lawsuits on Sept. 12 in a California state court against UPS, the owner of the building and the company UPS contracted to provide security services, claiming that each defendant failed to protect the employees and allowed a man with a gun to enter the building and open fire (Sandy Lim, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al., No. CGC-17-561241; Alvin Chen, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. CGC-17-561241-245; Peter Tran v. United Parcel Service Inc., et al., No. CGC-17-561247; Ryan Bailey, et al. v. United Parcel Service, et al., No. CGC-17-561237, Calif. Super., San Francisco Co.).
CHARLESTON, W.Va. - The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals on Sept. 1 affirmed a defense verdict in a wrongful death suit after finding that the trial court did not err by prohibiting the plaintiff's attorneys from saying certain words during the trial (Lisa Brown v. Berkeley Family Medicine Associates Inc., et al., No. 16-0572, W.Va. Sup. App., 2017 W.Va. LEXIS 629).
SAN FRANCISCO - Four movie studio plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their copyright infringement claims against a video-streaming service that provides filtered, family-friendly copies of movies, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled Aug. 24, affirming a preliminary injunction preventing any filtering of the plaintiffs' works (Disney Enterprises Inc., et al. v. VidAngel Inc., No. 16-56843, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16188).
ATLANTA - A Georgia Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 14 found that a vicarious liability claim against a medical practice in a suit in which family members alleged negligent care led to a woman's death was not added to the suit after the two-year statute of limitations expired because it was not a new claim, but was clarified in the plaintiffs' amended complaint (Heather Oller, et al. v. Rockdale Hospital LLC, et al., No. A17A1208, Ga. App., 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 383).
WHEELING, W.Va. - A federal jury in West Virginia on July 31 awarded $2.9 million to the parents of a student at Wheeling Jesuit University who was killed in a drunken brawl after finding that everyone involved in the fight was negligent (Thomas G. Figaniak, et al. v. Craig Tyler Peacock, et al., No. 5:15-CV-111, N.D. W.Va.).
PHILADELPHIA - The parents of a man who became permanently disabled as a result of the assault filed suit July 20 in Pennsylvania state court against two fraternities, their members and other businesses, claiming that the fraternities were irresponsible by allowing their members to get into a fight and failing to call an ambulance in a timely manner (Roderick J. McGibbon, et al. v. Alpha Upsilon Chapter of Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity, et al., No. 001934, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.).
LOS ANGELES - A California jury on July 21 awarded a total of $24.9 million to a man who lost his family in a car crash and the man who injured himself after crashing into the family after finding that the brakes in a 2004 Nissan Infinity QX56, which crashed into a minivan, were defective (Hilario Cruz, et al. v. Nissan North America Inc., No. BC493949, Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co.).
NEW YORK - A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on July 19 vacated a jury verdict for an employer in a Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) lawsuit, finding that the retaliation claims brought by the employee required only a "motivating factor" causation standard and that the employee was unduly prejudiced when the jury was permitted to infer that the employee would have answered "yes" to relevant questions at her deposition (Cassandra Woods v. START Treatment & Recovery Centers, Inc., No. 16-1318, 2nd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13038).
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - A federal jury in Connecticut on July 17 found that General Motors LLC failed to warn about a "known or knowledgeable danger" in one of its vehicles and awarded the family of a girl who died when the car started rolling on its own $2.8 million (Bernard Pitterman, et al. v. General Motors LLC, No. 3:14-CV-00967, D. Conn.).
ST. LOUIS - The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 11 reversed and vacated a lower court's award of prejudgment interest to a family-owned poultry and pet food company insured because the jury had to exercise discretion in determining the insured's losses from snowstorm damage but affirmed the lower court's denial of both the insurers' motion to dismiss and the insured's request for statutory damages and attorney fees (Simmons Foods, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers, et al., Nos. 15-3755 and 15-3845, 8th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12350).
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal district court did not err in granting an insurer's motion for summary judgment on an insured's claim for insurance bad faith because the insured failed to plead any genuine issues of material facts to support the claim, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled June 19 in affirming (Jesse Kalberer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., No. 14-17220, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10779).
ST. LOUIS - A Missouri state court judge on June 20 declared a mistrial in a suit brought by three plaintiffs claiming that they or their family members developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder sold by Johnson & Johnson, a day after the U.S. . Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, et al., which affects jurisdiction on product liability suits (Michael Blaes, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 1422-CC09326-01, Mo. 22nd Jud. Cir.).
TACOMA, Wash. - Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) can file a third-party complaint against the estate of a man who formerly owned the site of a gas station he and his wife leased to the company so it can seek a claim for contribution under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) because it does not need to incur costs for remedial actions before filing suit, a federal judge in Washington ruled June 7 (Wakefield Family, LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Company, No. C17-5114-RBL, W.D. Wash., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87520).
SAN FRANCISCO - In a May 31 brief, Twitter Inc. asks the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to affirm dismissal of a lawsuit brought against it by family members of two terror victims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), citing the plaintiffs' failure to establish liability for a terrorist's actions, as well as the safe harbor provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) (Tamara Fields, et al. v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-17165, 9th Cir.).
MOBILE, Ala. - An Alabama federal judge on May 23 denied without prejudice a motion by a the lead plaintiff in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class suit to enjoin a copycat class action filed in the New Jersey federal court because a motion to dismiss, stay or transfer is currently pending in New Jersey (Family Medicine Pharmacy, LLC v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., No. 17-0053, S.D. Ala., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77797).
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 17 rejected a doctor and his wife's argument that they were entitled to coverage for an adverse verdict in a wrongful death suit because their homeowners insurance policy's abuse exclusion was not applicable, affirming a lower federal court's summary judgment ruling in favor of the insurer (American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlos F. Verdugo, M.D., et al., Nos. 16-15687 and 16-15717, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8828).
CHICAGO - An Illinois panel on May 10 held that insureds' counterclaim and third-party complaint against a homeowners insurer and an insurance agent are timely in a coverage dispute arising from underlying bullying and harassment claims, reversing a lower court (American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Walter Krop, et al., No. 1-16-1071, Ill. App., 1st Dist., 3rd Div., 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 310).
OKLAHOMA CITY - Halliburton Energy Services Inc. (HESI) on May 8 filed a brief in Oklahoma federal court arguing that 10 prior orders issued in a lawsuit brought against it by residents who argue that the company is liable for contaminating their drinking water should be adopted in another lawsuit that asserts the same causes of action (Albin Family Revocable Living Trust, et al. v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc., No. 16-910, W.D. Okla.).
SEATTLE - A stay of proceedings in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit is proper because the stay will not substantially injure the plaintiffs, a federal judge in Washington ruled May 8 in granting an insurer's motion in a third-party automobile insurance dispute (Kathleen Link, et al. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., No. 16-1117, W.D. Wash., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70046).
LOS ANGELES - Family members of three victims of the December 2015 terror attack in San Bernardino, Calif., filed suit in California federal court May 3 against Twitter Inc., Facebook Inc. and Google Inc., alleging that the three internet firms provided support to the terrorists via their online platforms in violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) (Gregory Clayborn, et al. v. Twitter Inc., et al., No. 2:17-cv-03344, C.D. Calif.).
NEW YORK - In an unpublished decision, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held April 25 that a Connecticut federal judge properly dismissed a putative class action filed by Family Dollar Stores Inc. employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, saying that the plaintiffs failed to show that the insurance company that issued group life insurance to them was a fiduciary under ERISA (Patrick Hannan, et al. v. Hartford Financial Services Inc., et al., No. 16-1316, 2nd Cir.).
CINCINNATI - An employee with mental health issues who was demoted and then fired after taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may proceed with his retaliation claims brought under the FMLA and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a split Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled April 20, partially reversing a trial court's ruling (Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC, No. 16-5614, 6th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6854).
DENVER - The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 21 affirmed a lower federal court's finding that a homeowners insurer did not violate its policy when it depreciated labor costs in determining the actual cash value of an insured's loss following hail and water damage (Margaret Graves v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., No. 15-3187, 10th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6980).
DENVER - The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 19 rejected insureds' argument that an insurer acted in bad faith by unreasonably delaying an appraisal and by failing to conduct an adequate claim investigation, affirming a lower federal court's ruling in favor of the insurer (Hayes Family Trust, et al. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty, No. 15-6231, 10th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6713).